Skip to content

· Private foundation

Milton I and Frances L Stiefel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$156k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$186kArts & Culture$151kAnimals$110kPublic Safety & Disaster$108kHuman Services$93kPhilanthropy$85kFood & Nutrition$64kInternational$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $98k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STIEFEL THEATRE FOR THE PERFORMING$20,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS OF KANSAS$15,000
SALINA HEALTH EDUCATION FOUND$15,000
SALINA ANIMAL SERVICES$15,000
Individual grant recipient$13,000
NATIONAL JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES$10,000
SALINA AREA UNITED WAY INC$5,000
THE SALINA EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
SALINA COMMUNITY THEATRE INC$5,000
ROLLING HILLS ZOO FOUNDATION$5,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSN OF CENTRAL K$5,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SALINA$5,000
SALINA EMERGENCY AID FOOD BANK INC$5,000
SALINA GRACE FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $10k → 10%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL KANSAS: $20k → 13%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL KANSAS: $8k → 13%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL KANSAS: $7k → 13%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL KANSAS: $5k → 13%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSN OF CENTRAL K: $5k → 13%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL KANSAS: $5k → 13%SALINA FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 13%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL KANSAS: $5k → 13%SALINA CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC: $3k → 13%SALINA CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Milton I and Frances L Stiefel Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Milton I and Frances L Stiefel Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$874k · 23 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
5

Total granted

$874k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
0%

Still filing today

57%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SALINA HEALTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +154%
  • SE
    SALINA EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $55k · revenue +32%
  • SA
    SALINA AREA UNITED WAY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +342%

Funded once

  • SR
    SALINA REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue -57%
  • PM
    PRAIRIELAND MARKET INC
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • SA
    SALINA ART CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Salina Community Economic Development Organization Inc

Promote and support economic development

Community Improvement
2
Salina Area Chamber of Commerceinc

To advance the general welfare and prosperity of the salina area so its citizens and all areas of its business community shall prosper.

Community Improvement
3
Salina Regional Health Center Inc

To provide quality health care services in a healing and spiritual environment

Health
4
Salina Innovation Foundation

Our mission is to save and preserve the historic salina temple building for use as a community resource center.

Arts & Culture
5
Saline County Humane Society

To provide care and refuge for animals in need.

—
6
Hospice of Salina Inc

Serve persons with terminal illness and their families, using multidisciplinary team of medical and social service professionals, and provide community outreach by offering grief support groups and end of life education.

Human Services
7
Senior Adults Legal Assistance

Support older persons in their efforts to live safely, independently, non-institutionalized, and with dignity.

Crime & Legal
8
Salina Help for Housing

Building houses for low income families.

—
9
Saline County Medical Foundation

Support services for saline memorial hospital.

Unclassified
10
Salina Presbyterian Manor Endowment Fund

The salina presbyterian manor endowment fund is a support organization of the salina presbyterian manor, one of several facilities of presbyterian manors of mid-america, inc., a non-profit corporation. the sole activity of the endowment…

Philanthropy
11
Salina Free Library

Library for benefit of public

—
12
Saline Area Social Service Inc

Saline area social service provides food, emergency aid, and support to those in need in the saline community. sass aims to build a stronger community of neighbors helping neighbors.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Salina Regional Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STIEFEL THEATRE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $102,500 · OtherSTIEFEL THEATRE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTSSALINA ANIMAL SERVICES: $95,000 · OtherSALINA ANIMAL SERVICESNORTH CENTRAL KANSAS RED CROSS: $90,000 · OtherNORTH CENTRAL KANSAS RED CROSSNATIONAL JEWISH MEDICAL CENTER: $70,000 · OtherNATIONAL JEWISH MEDICAL CENTERSALINA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $55,000 · OtherSALINA EDUCATION FOUNDATIONSALINA EMERGENCY AIDFOOD BANK INC: $43,000 · OtherSALINA EMERGENCY AIDFOOD BANK INCBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $35,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARI: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $34,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $29,000 · OtherAMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC DBA JDC: $25,000 · Other+11 more: $90,700 · Other+11 moreSALINA AREA UNITED WAY INC: $45,000 · PhilanthropySALINA AR…Greater Salina Community Foundation: $39,750 · PhilanthropyGreater S…DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL KANSAS INC: $54,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $10,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of Salina Kansas: $5,000 · Human ServicesSALINA CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesSALINA HEALTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $70,000 · EducationSALINA REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthSUNFLOWER ADULT DAY SERVICES INC: $16,000 · HealthSALINA COMMUNITY THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $7,000 · Arts & CultureROLLING HILLS ZOO FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSALINA ART CENTER INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSALINA RESCUE MISSION INC: $12,500 · Housing & ShelterSALINA GRACE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$704,200Philanthropy$84,750Human Services$74,000Education$70,000Health$46,000Arts & Culture$27,000Housing & Shelter$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSALINA HEALTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSALINA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL KANSAS INC: $54,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetSALINA AREA UNITED WAY INC: $45,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetSALINA EMERGENCY AIDFOOD BANK INC: $43,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetGreater Salina Community Foundation: $39,750 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSALINA REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE RIVER FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetSUNFLOWER ADULT DAY SERVICES INC: $16,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetSALINA RESCUE MISSION INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSALINA COMMUNITY THEATRE ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSALINA GRACE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRAIRIELAND MARKET INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSALINA ART CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Salina Kansas: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNOWZAD DOGS NFP: $5,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSALINA CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SALINA HEALTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SALINA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL KANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SALINA AREA UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds SALINA EMERGENCY AIDFOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Greater Salina Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SALINA REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE RIVER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUNFLOWER ADULT DAY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SALINA RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds SALINA COMMUNITY THEATRE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SALINA GRACE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIELAND MARKET INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds ROLLING HILLS ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SALINA INC ↗
  • Who funds SALINA ART CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Salina Kansas ↗
  • Who funds NOWZAD DOGS NFP ↗
  • Who funds SALINA CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

McCune & Middlekauff FoundationKS39.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: McCune & Middlekauff Foundation · Smoot Charitable Foundation · Earl Bane Foundation · Mike Berkley Family Foundation Inc · Greater Salina Community Foundation · Mildred and Rolland Middlekauff Foundation · Verla Nesbitt Joscelyn Foundation · Salina Regional Health Foundation · Morrison Foundation Trust · Jack a Wilson Charitable Trust · Horejsi Charitable Foundation Inc · Marshall Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Milton I and Frances L Stiefel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Milton I and Frances L Stiefel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Milton I and Frances L Stiefel Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Milton I and Frances L Stiefel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Milton I and Frances L Stiefel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph