Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Milton George & Marion Char-Main

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$481k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$96k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Animals$558kHealth$540kCivil Rights$540kInternational$523kEducation$274kArts & Culture$270k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $193k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $289k
$48,135
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE$96,271
DENVER WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL$96,271
THE ENGLISH SPEAKING UNION OF US$96,271
UNIVERSITY OF COLO FOUNDATION$48,135
LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FDN$48,135
AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE INC$48,135
PLANED PARENTHOOD OF ROCKY MTS$48,135
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE INC: $49k → 14%LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $49k → 7%DENVER WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL: $56k → 12%AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE INC: $48k → 14%LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $48k → 7%DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $56k → 12%AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE INC: $45k → 14%LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $45k → 7%PLANED PARENTHOOD OF ROCKY MTS: $49k → 12%AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE INC: $44k → 14%LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $44k → 7%THE ENGLISH SPEAKING UNION OF US: $98k → 12%AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE INC: $37k → 14%LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $37k → 7%PLANED PARENTHOOD OF ROCKY MTS: $48k → 12%AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE INC: $28k → 14%LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $28k → 7%THE ENGLISH SPEAKING UNION OF US: $96k → 12%AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE INC: $19k → 14%LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FDN: $19k → 7%PLANED PARENTHOOD OF ROCKY MTS: $45k → 12%THE ENGLISH SPEAKING UNION OF US: $89k → 12%PLANED PARENTHOOD OF ROCKY MTS: $44k → 12%THE ENGLISH SPEAKING UNION OF US: $89k → 12%PLANED PARENTHOOD OF ROCKY MTS: $37k → 12%THE ENGLISH SPEAKING UNION OF US: $75k → 12%PLANED PARENTHOOD OF ROCKY MTS: $28k → 12%THE ENGLISH SPEAKING UNION OF US: $56k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLO FOUNDATION: $28k → 12%THE ENGLISH SPEAKING UNION OF US: $37k → 12%PLANED PARENTHOOD OF ROCKY MTS: $19k → 12%DENVER WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL: $98k → 12%DENVER WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL: $96k → 12%DENVER WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL: $89k → 12%DENVER WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL: $89k → 12%DENVER WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL: $75k → 12%DENVER WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL: $20k → 12%DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $98k → 12%DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $96k → 12%DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $89k → 12%DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $89k → 12%DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $75k → 12%DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $55k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLO FOUNDATION: $49k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLO FOUNDATION: $48k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLO FOUNDATION: $48k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLO FOUNDATION: $45k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $37k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 7 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
0

Total granted

$2.7M
$0

Still filing today

71%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DD
    DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $558k · revenue +253%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $274k · revenue +58%
  • LM
    LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $270k · revenue +123%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field
    04the grantee network

    5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    5/5
    Grantees still filing
    4/5
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    THE ENGLISH SPEAKING UNION OF US — $540,442 · OtherTHE ENGLISH SPEAKING UNION OF USPLANED PARENTHOOD OF ROCKY MTS — $270,221 · OtherPLANED PARENTHOOD OF ROCKY MTSDENVER WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL DBA WORLDDE — $523,082 · EducationDENVER WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL DBA …UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $273,921 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $557,805 · AnimalsDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEA…LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $270,221 · HealthLUTHERAN ME…THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE — $270,221 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICA…
    Other$810,663Education$797,003Animals$557,805Health$270,221Arts & Culture$270,221

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE — $557,805 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetDENVER WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL DBA WORLDDE — $523,082 over 7y, 18% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $273,921 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $270,221 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE — $270,221 over 7y, 0.1% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE
    • Who funds DENVER WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL DBA WORLDDE
    • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    • Who funds LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    • Who funds THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Milton George & Marion Char-Main funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph