Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Millar Scholarship Fund

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$386k
Granted FY2023
15
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$372k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of Millar Scholarship Fund’s FY2023 grant dollars went to The Oregon Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
17
1
18
1
19
3
20
4
21
0
22
3
23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Philanthropy$372kEducation$75k
02FY2023 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k14 grants · $14k
  • $250k+1 grant · $372k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$371,877
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$2,000
PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,000
PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
PORTLAND STATE U NIVERSITY$1,000
PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY$1,000
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON$1,000
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON$1,000
GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY$1,000
MULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY$1,000
AVEDA INSTITUTE PORTLAND$500
MOUNT HOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND: $650 → 12%UNIVERSITY OF OREGON: $2k → 15%OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 18%OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $372k → 12%WARNER PACIFIC COLLEGE: $650 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$64k · 9 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$64k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+32%

Still filing today

44%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2023 · $14k
  • OS
    OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2023 · $12k
  • MH
    MOUNT HOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    5× · 2018–2023 · $10k

Funded once

  • WO
    WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +32%
  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -100%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle University

Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.

2
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
3
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
4
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

7
Northwest University

We, the people of northwest university, carry the call of god by continually building a learning community dedicated to spiritual vitality, academic excellence, and empowered engagement with human need.

8
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

9
Pacific Union College

Pacific union college is a seventh-day adventist learning community offering an excellent christ-centered education that prepares its students for productive lives of useful human service and uncompromising personal integrity.

Education
10
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
11
Corban University

Corban university's goal is to equip men and women who will bring character to their communities and competence to their careers, all to the glory of christ.

Education
12
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Portland and the most unlike its peers is Concordia University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $371,877 · PhilanthropyTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONPORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY — $14,150 · OtherPORTLAND STAT…OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY — $12,300 · OtherOREGON STATE …MOUNT HOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $10,000 · OtherMOUNT HOOD CO…UNIVERSITY OF OREGON — $6,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF…PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $5,150 · OtherPORTLAND COMM…WESTERN OREGON UNIVERSITY — $3,500 · OtherWESTERN OREGO…+3 more — $3,000 · Other+3 moreSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $5,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND — $4,650 · EducationWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY — $3,500 · EducationGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY — $3,500 · EducationWARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $2,650 · EducationMULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY — $1,000 · Education
Philanthropy$371,877Other$54,600Education$20,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $371,877 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND — $4,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $2,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND
  • Who funds WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds GEORGE FOX UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MULTNOMAH UNIVERSITY

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Millar Scholarship Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Warner Pacific University14% of income from government
  • George Fox University2% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation2% of income from government
  • Willamette University1% of income from government
  • University of Portland1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph