Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mill Creek Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$247k
Granted FY2022
52
Grants FY2022
—
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$110kEducation$84kHuman Services$64kFood & Nutrition$63kCommunity Improvement$57kRecreation & Sports$36kYouth Development$24kHealth$21kOther$0
02FY2022 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 52 grants below total $219,867, the rows itemized in this filing. The $247,367 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $27,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k48 grants · $150k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
$3,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chamber of Commerce-Carryover$25,000
Chamber of Commerce-Community Venue$25,000
EGSC Foundation-Athletic Program$10,000
Summertown Food Pantry$10,000
Franklin Memorial Library-RIF$8,000
St. Philip Center of Hope$8,000
Bd of Education-AEDs$7,900
Sunshine House CAC$7,500
Friends of G L Smith State Park$5,500
EGSC Foundation-Apiary Project$5,370
Emanuel Resource Center$5,000
Wreaths Across America-Veterans$5,000
David Emanuel Academy$5,000
Golden Harvest Food Bank$5,000
Pine Tree Festival Foundation$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%SEE ATTACHED -: $250k → 21%SEE ATTACHED: $222k → 21%SEE ATTACHED -: $221k → 21%SEE ATTACHED -: $206k → 21%SEE attached: $197k → 21%SEE ATTACHED: $186k → 21%HISTORIC DIXIE THEATRE: $25k → 21%LEADERSHIP EMANUEL: $8k → 21%COMMUNITY ACTION FOR YOUTH: $7k → 21%FRANKLIN MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $7k → 21%FRIENDS: $5k → 21%MOGAN HOUSE: $5k → 21%EGSC STUDY ABROAD: $5k → 21%SOUTHEASTERN TECH COLLEGE: $5k → 21%SWAINSBORO SHRINE CLUB: $5k → 21%EGSC FOUNDATION CHOICE: $5k → 21%SONS OF AMERICAN LEGION: $5k → 21%EMAN SR CTR MEALS: $5k → 21%SUMMERTOWN FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 21%WEEKEND BLESSINGS: $5k → 21%HISTORIC TWIN CITY: $5k → 21%GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK: $5k → 21%SOUTHEASTERN TECH: $5k → 21%PINETREE FESTIVAL: $5k → 21%VISION 2020 CHAMBER: $5k → 21%TLC CHILDRENS SERVICES: $5k → 21%EMANUEL BOSE TCES: $5k → 21%EMANUEL BOE FINE ARTS: $4k → 21%EMPTY STOCKING FUND: $4k → 21%BOE SHS BAND CARNEIGE: $4k → 21%BOE SES RADING MATH: $3k → 21%NUNEZ FIRE DEPT: $3k → 21%SWAINSBORO EXCHANGE CLUB: $3k → 21%DYL WORLD SERIES: $3k → 21%EMANUEL SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 21%EGSC: $3k → 21%EGSC PROTECTIVE VEST: $3k → 21%EGSC FOUNDATION INVENT: $2k → 21%EMANUEL HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 21%ST PHILLIP CENTER OF HOPE: $2k → 21%EMANUEL BOE: $2k → 21%FRANKLIN MEMORIAL: $2k → 21%SUNSHINE HOUSE 25TH: $2k → 21%EMANUEL 4H: $2k → 21%FISHERS OF MEN CRUSADE: $2k → 21%STILLMORE VBS: $2k → 21%EMANUEL ARTS COUNCIL: $1k → 21%FRANKLIN MEMORIAL: $1k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$131k · 13 repeat orgs$439k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
64

Total granted

$131k
$285k

Still filing today

0%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $154k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’22
Civil RightsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    Summertown Food Pantry
    2× · 2019–2022 · $20k
  • SH
    Sunshine House CAC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $18k
  • FM
    Franklin Memorial Library-RIF
    2× · 2019–2022 · $15k

Funded once

  • HD
    HISTORIC DIXIE THEATRE
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • SG
    Special Grant-Jean Morgan Tribute-EGSC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • HD
    Historic Dixie Theater
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
3/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Chamber of Commerce-Carryover: $25,000 · OtherHISTORIC DIXIE THEATRE: $25,000 · OtherChamber of Commerce-Community Venue: $25,000 · OtherSpecial Grant-Jean Morgan Tribute-EGSC: $25,000 · OtherSummertown Food Pantry: $20,000 · Other+104 more: $440,175 · Other+104 moreTLC CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsGOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$560,175Civil Rights$5,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTLC CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGOLDEN HARVEST FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmpty Stocking Fund Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mill Creek Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mill Creek Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 111 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $250k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mill Creek’s filings →

    More from the funding graph