Skip to content

· Private foundation

Migliara Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$180kCrime & Legal$88kHealth$77kHousing & Shelter$5k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $48k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$714k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION$37,500
WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TRUSTEES AT UNIVERSITY OF PA: $5k → 22%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY: $5k → 10%BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL: $1k → 11%COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION: $5k → 11%NORTHWEST HOSPITAL: $5k → 6%WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE: $10k → 11%SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE: $10k → 19%COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION: $5k → 11%WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE: $10k → 11%LIFE BRIDGE HEALTH: $10k → 19%COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION: $5k → 11%WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE: $10k → 11%LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH CENTER FOR HOPE: $51k → 19%COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION: $38k → 11%WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE: $10k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION: $25k → 11%LOYOLA BLAKEFIELD: $5k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION: $5k → 11%WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE: $5k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION: $5k → 11%WOMEN'S EDUCATION ALLIANCE: $5k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE: $5k → 11%ARCHBISHOP BORDERS SCHOOL: $15k → 19%MARYVALE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $10k → 11%ARCHBISHOP BORDERS SCHOOL: $15k → 19%ARCHBISHOP BORDERS SCHOOL: $10k → 19%ARCHBISHOP BORDERS SCHOOL: $10k → 19%ARCHBISHOP BORDERS SCHOOL: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$243k · 4 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +84% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
9

Total granted

$243k
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+84%
+25%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $88k · revenue +122%
  • WE
    WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $55k · revenue +84%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2023 · $40k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • LH
    LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH CENTER FOR HOPE
    one grant, 2020 · $51k
  • MP
    MARYVALE PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • LH
    LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION INC: $87,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION INCARCHBISHOP BORDERS SCHOOL INC: $60,000 · OtherARCHBISHOP BORDERS SCHOOL INCLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH CENTER FOR HOPE: $50,528 · OtherLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH CENTER FOR HOPEMARYVALE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $20,000 · Other+4 moreWOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC: $55,000 · EducationWOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE INCJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC: $10,000 · HealthSINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC: $10,000 · HealthBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $1,000 · HealthHabitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$228,028Education$95,000Health$21,000Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION INC: $87,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC: $55,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc ↗
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Migliara Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Migliara Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Community Partners in Action Inc: 90% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Lifebridge Health Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Sinai Hospital of Baltimore Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Migliara Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph