Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Michigan · Public charity

Michigan Economic Developers Association

To advance economic development throughout michigan and increase an individuals (both member and non-member) effectiveness in the economic development profession through educational programs, meetings and literature.

$16k
Granted FY2020
1
Grants FY2020
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Michigan Economic Developers Association’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Capital Region Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Median grant, FY2020
$16,350
Largest grant, FY2020
$16,350
States reached, FY2020
1
Total assets, FY2020
$513k

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2020.

CAPITAL REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$16,350

Compare Michigan Economic Developers Association with peer funders

About Michigan Economic Developers Association

How much does Michigan Economic Developers Association give?
Michigan Economic Developers Association reported 1 grants totaling $16,350 in its FY2020 IRS filing.
What does Michigan Economic Developers Association fund?
By grant dollars, its largest causes are Philanthropy (100%).
Where is Michigan Economic Developers Association based?
Michigan Economic Developers Association is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $100 of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Michigan Economic Developers Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home