Loading…
· Private foundation
MICHELLE J F ELKIND CHARITABLE TR
This charitable trust is formed to give charitable donations to various non-profit organizations and assist them to accomplish their goals and objectives that aligns with this charitable trust's idealism, which covers multiple facets of needs in modern day cities.
$47k
Granted FY2024
20
Grants
6
Communities
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 20 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k19 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$369k
Total assets
Largest grants
- YOUNG ISRAEL OF NORTHRIDGE$10,000
- NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION$5,000
- LINK KOLLEL$4,000
- STAND WITH US$3,000
- PRAGER UNIVERSITY$3,000
- TREEPEOPLE$2,000
- HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL$2,000
- ONE ISRAEL FUND$2,000
- AUTISM SPEAKS$2,000
- AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$2,000
- MARCH OF DIMES$2,000
- MAKE A WISH AMERICA$2,000
- AISH TAMID OF LOS ANGELES$1,500
- CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$1,000
- SAVE THE CHILDREN$1,000
02The need
02
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 10%. 87% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah
To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa
Religion
2
One for Israel
To unite U.S and international churches, ministries and individuals for the proclamation of the Gospel in Israel, to raise funds for evangelism and Gospel proclamation, to provide tangible relief for Israel's needy through charity, and to…
Religion
3
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel.
Religion
4
United Israel Appeal Inc
Uia is responsible for the allocation and oversight of funds raised by the united states jewish federation campaigns expended in israel by the jewish agency for israel.
International
5
American Friends of Mosdos Montreal Inc
To promote and enhance jewish religious observance
Religion
6
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La
Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…
Philanthropy
7
The American Friends of Museums
Recognizing, promoting, and honoring its outstanding partner museums in israel by providing exhibition, program, project and financial support through the generosity of its donors.
—
8
Israel Team Advocates International Inc
Promote understanding and support for the people of israel
International
9
Weizmann Institute of Science
institutions in the world, noted for its wide-ranging exploration of the sciences and technology.
Science & Tech
10
Jewish Community Foundation of
Philanthropic asset management and grantmaking to both jewish and secular charitable organizations.
Philanthropy
11
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company
the organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the UCSF Foundation.
Education
12
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc
To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Aish Tamid of Los Angeles. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$35,500International$3,000Housing & Shelter$2,000Health$2,000Environment$2,000Religion$1,500Community Improvement$1,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation MICHELLE J F ELKIND CHARITABLE TR funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: AISH TAMID OF LOS ANGELES.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~31 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 900086051 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on AISH TAMID OF LOS ANGELES, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 31 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Michelle J F Elkind Charitable Tr?
Find your warmest path to Michelle J F Elkind Charitable Tr through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines