Skip to content

· Public charity

Mib Agents Inc

Mib agents is a leading pediatric osteosarcoma nonprofit dedicated to making it better for our community of patients, caregivers, doctors, and researchers through programs, education, and research.mib agents envisions a world with less toxic, more effective treatments and a cure for osteosarcoma, an aggressive pediatric bone cancer.our…

$350k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$1.4M
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY RESEARCH FOUNDATION$100,000
RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK$100,000
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$50,000
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$50,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE: $100k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $100k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES: $100k → 14%MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $50k → 17%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $50k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER: $75k → 10%THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $100k → 15%UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS CLEVELAND MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $100k → 14%RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CA
CO
KY
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Kentucky Research Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Emory University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $225,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · OtherCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITYNATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INC: $100,000 · OtherNATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INCREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $75,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADOUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INCUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDAUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $100,000 · EducationUniversity of Kentucky Research FoundationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $100,000 · EducationResearch Foundation of the City University of Ne…Trustees of Tufts College: $100,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeUniversity of Chicago: $100,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoBaylor College of Medicine: $50,000 · EducationBaylor College of MedicineEmory University: $50,000 · EducationEmory UniversityChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $100,000 · HealthChildren's H…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $50,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLO…
Other$650,000Education$600,000Health$150,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mib Agents Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mib Agents Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mib Agents’ filings →

More from the funding graph