Skip to content

· Public charity

MI Vision

To operate exclusively for the promotion of civic action and social welfare by promoting the common good and general welfare of Michigan residents and visitors; to promote and encourage citizen participation in political and civic events; to promote charitable causes that include lessening the burdens of government in the State of…

$105k
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Public Benefit$75kPhilanthropy$25kYouth Development$16kFood & Nutrition$10kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $80,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $104,739 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $24,739 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTEGRITY IN GOVERNMENT FUND$25,000
UNITED WAY OF CLARE AND GLADW$25,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH$10,000
ANGELS OF ACTION INC$10,000
CLARE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%UNITED WAY OF CLARE AND GLADW: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAKE MICHIGAN FIRST: $50,000 · Social ScienceMAKE MICHIGAN FIRSTUNITED WAY OF CLARE COUNTY: $25,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF CLARE …INTEGRITY IN GOVERNMENT FUND: $25,000 · Civil RightsINTEGRITY IN GOVERNM…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS …CLARE COUNTY JUNIOR LIVESTOCK ASSOCIATION: $5,774 · Youth DevelopmentCLARE COUNTY …CLARE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10,000 · OtherANGELS OF ACTION INC: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Social Science$50,000Human Services$25,000Civil Rights$25,000Youth Development$15,774Other$10,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAKE MICHIGAN FIRST: $50,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CLARE COUNTY: $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetINTEGRITY IN GOVERNMENT FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCLARE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $10,000 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANGELS OF ACTION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCLARE COUNTY JUNIOR LIVESTOCK ASSOCIATION: $5,774 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization MI Vision funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from MI Vision. Bigger dots raise more.

2022
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to MI Vision?

    Find your warmest path to MI Vision through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on MI Vision’s filings →

    More from the funding graph