Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Meyer and Esther B Mazor Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$51k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Environment$75kInternational$58kFood & Nutrition$48kArts & Culture$32kScience & Tech$22kAnimals$20kCivil Rights$18kReligion$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $33k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$540k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOIL SUSTAINABLE ORGANIC INT LIV$13,000
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISREAL DEFENCE FORCE$10,000
FOOD AND WATER WATCH$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$3,000
FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY$2,000
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$2,000
COLEL CHABAD$1,000
OCEANA INC$1,000
ANIMAL WELFARE INST$1,000
FAIR$1,000
NATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$1,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GOLDEN HEART RANCH: $2k → 14%GOLDEN HEART RANCH: $2k → 14%GOLDEN HEART RANCH: $2k → 14%GOLDEN HEART RANCH: $2k → 14%GOLDEN HEART RANCH: $2k → 14%GOLDEN HEART RANCH: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$280k · 17 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$280k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+80%

Still filing today

59%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesAnimalsEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +98%
  • THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +12%
  • AW
    ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • C2
    CARE 2 COMMUNITIES FKA CONTAINERS TO CLINICS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +80%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
2
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
3
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
4
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
5
International Food Information Council

To effectively communicate science based information on food safety, nutrition, and health for the public good.

Arts & Culture
6
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
7
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

8
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
9
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
10
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

11
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
12
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Jewish World Service Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOIL SUSTAINABLE ORGANIC INT LIV — $35,000 · OtherSOIL SUSTAINABLE ORGANIC INT LIVFRIENDS OF THE ISREAL DEFENCE FORCE — $20,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE ISREAL DEFENCE FORCENATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL — $20,000 · OtherNATIONAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCILAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION — $18,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONIndividual grant recipient — $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINSIGHTLA INC — $12,000 · OtherINSIGHTLA INCGOLDEN HEART RANCH — $12,000 · OtherGOLDEN HEART RANCHALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $11,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC+3 more — $5,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $24,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTI…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $22,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERN…AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $12,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORL…FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF …WNET — $12,000 · Arts & CultureWNETCARE 2 COMMUNITIES FKA CONTAINERS TO CLINICS INC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureCARE 2 COMM…FOOD & WATER WATCH — $30,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD & WAT…ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE — $20,000 · AnimalsOCEANA INC — $20,000 · EnvironmentFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $18,000 · Community Improvement
Other$145,000International$58,000Arts & Culture$34,000Food & Nutrition$30,000Animals$20,000Environment$20,000Community Improvement$18,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFOOD & WATER WATCH — $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $22,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE — $20,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOCEANA INC — $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $18,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN HEART RANCH — $12,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWNET — $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCARE 2 COMMUNITIES FKA CONTAINERS TO CLINICS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD & WATER WATCH
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE
  • Who funds OCEANA INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY
  • Who funds GOLDEN HEART RANCH
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC
  • Who funds WNET
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds CARE 2 COMMUNITIES FKA CONTAINERS TO CLINICS INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Meyer and Esther B Mazor Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Meyer and Esther B Mazor Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Meyer and Esther B Mazor Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph