Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Michigan · Public charity

Metro Detroit USBC Association

Promote the game of American Tenpins, conduct and support bowling competition, and provide equal opportunity for all in the sport of bowling without regard to race, religion, gender, disability or national origin.

$396k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
2
Organizations funded FY2022
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2022
$387,224
Largest grant, FY2022
$387,224
States reached, FY2022
1
Total assets, FY2022
$802k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
United States Bowling Congress Inc$387,22411%
Ibc Youth Bowling Inc$7,31410%

Compare Metro Detroit USBC Association with peer funders

About Metro Detroit USBC Association

How much does Metro Detroit USBC Association give?
Metro Detroit USBC Association reported 2 grants totaling $395,838 in its FY2022 IRS filing.
What does Metro Detroit USBC Association fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2022, its largest causes are Recreation & Sports (100%).
Who are Metro Detroit USBC Association's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2022: United States Bowling Congress Inc ($387k), Ibc Youth Bowling Inc ($7k).
Where is Metro Detroit USBC Association based?
Metro Detroit USBC Association is based in MI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $1k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Metro Detroit USBC Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home