Skip to content

· Private foundation

Metflex Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0174% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Health$22kReligion$5kEducation$5kPhilanthropy$2kCommunity Improvement$1kEnvironment$515Youth Development$478Recreation & Sports$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$400
Median grant
2
States reached
$385k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UT HEALTH ENDOWMENT$20,000
SPRING BRANCH ACADEMIC INSTITUTE$2,124
VALLEY OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,760
HINDUS OF GREATER HOUSTON$1,226
TEXAS CHILDREN HOSPITAL$1,000
Individual grant recipient$664
THE LOOP INSTITUTE$515
NATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE$475
VAISHNAV YOUTH RETREAT$400
Individual grant recipient$250
VALLEY VILLAGE DAD'S CLUB$200
SPRING BRANCH MIDDLE SCHOOL$121
GIRL SCOUTS OF THE USA$120
GIRL ON THE RUN GREATER HOUSTON$108
MHS BOOSTER CLUB$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%GIRL SCOUTS OF THE USA: $120 → 17%BHY NCL MEMORIAL: $625 → 5%VAISHNAV YOUTH RETREAT: $400 → 8%FAN-PLEDGE LLC: $54 → 11%CMH BOOKSTORE: $20 → 16%GIRL SCOUTS OF USA: $50 → 17%VALLEY OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $2k → 16%SPRUCE STREET SCHOOL: $50 → 17%VALLEY OAKS ELEMENTARY: $1k → 16%THE REGIS SCHOOL: $342 → 16%HINDUS OF GREATER HOUSTON: $1k → 16%VALLEY OAKS ELEMENTARY: $217 → 16%HHYC: $560 → 16%UT HEALTH ENDOWMENT: $20k → 16%THE REGIS SCHOOL: $201 → 16%HINDUS OF GREATER HOUSTON: $500 → 16%TEXAS CHILDREN HOSPITAL: $1k → 16%VALLEY VILLAGE DAD'S CLUB: $200 → 16%SPRING BRANCH EDUCATION: $4k → 16%SPRING BRANCH EDUCATION: $664 → 16%NATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE: $475 → 16%SBMS: $417 → 16%SBMS: $284 → 16%SPRING BRANCH EDUCATION: $155 → 16%SPRING BRANCH MIDDLE SCHOOL: $121 → 16%MHS BOOSTER CLUB: $100 → 16%BENDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $50 → 16%BENDWOOD ORDER: $20 → 16%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $50 → 16%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN: $250 → 16%THE LOOP INSTITUTE: $515 → 16%SPRING BRANCH ACADEMIC INSTITUTE: $2k → 16%GIRL ON THE RUN GREATER HOUSTON: $108 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14k · 6 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$14k
$1k

Still filing today

17%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CHINMAYA MISSION HOUSTON
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5k
  • HO
    HINDUS OF GREATER HOUSTON
    2× · 2024–2025 · $2k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $625
  • H
    HHYC
    one grant, 2023 · $560
  • FL
    FAN-PLEDGE LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $54
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
0/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UT HEALTH ENDOWMENT: $20,000 · OtherUT HEALTH ENDOWMENTCHINMAYA MISSION HOUSTON: $4,781 · OtherCHINMAYA MISSION HOUSTONIndividual grant recipient: $4,631 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSPRING BRANCH ACADEMIC INSTITUTE: $2,124 · OtherSPRING BRANCH ACADEMIC INSTITUTEVALLEY OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $1,760 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,408 · Other+16 more: $3,794 · Other+16 moreHINDUS OF GREATER HOUSTON: $1,726 · PhilanthropyTexas Children's Hospital: $1,000 · HealthTHE LOOP INSTITUTE INC: $515 · EducationNATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE INC BAYOU CITY CHAPTER: $475 · Community ImprovementGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $120 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON THE RUN GREATER HOUSTON: $108 · Youth Development
Other$38,498Philanthropy$1,726Health$1,000Education$515Community Improvement$475Youth Development$228

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHINDUS OF GREATER HOUSTON: $1,726 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOOP INSTITUTE INC: $515 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE INC BAYOU CITY CHAPTER: $475 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN GREATER HOUSTON: $108 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HINDUS OF GREATER HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds THE LOOP INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE INC BAYOU CITY CHAPTER ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN GREATER HOUSTON ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Metflex Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Metflex Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Metflex’s filings →

    More from the funding graph