Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mental Research Institute

To provide therapeutic services to individuals in the surrounding area, and further research and training in the mental health field through support provided to Mental Research Institute Trainings Inc.

$560k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
19
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$768kHealth$418kScience & Tech$173kHuman Services$121kRecreation & Sports$50kYouth Development$50kSocial Science$27kInternational$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $521k
$20,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE$25,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GRE$25,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$25,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$25,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$25,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY- METROPOLITAN C$25,000
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDAT$25,000
BRYN MAWR COLLEGE$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF DENVER$25,000
SEATTLE UNIVERSITY$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON$23,000
UNIVERSITY OF DENVER DEPARTMENT OF$20,121
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Thriving Families: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
AZ
KS
NC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Mental Research Institute’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Mental Research Institutelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$343k · 5 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
36

Total granted

$343k
$739k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+3%

Still filing today

20%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $418k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $183k · revenue +12%
  • AS
    Arizona State University
    3× · 2021–2024 · $60k
  • PS
    PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2025 · $48k

Funded once

  • B
    BYU
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • UO
    University of Iowa
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • PS
    Penn State University
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
4
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
5
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
6
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
7
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
8
Pomona College

Throughout its history, pomona college has educated men and women of exceptional promise. we gather individuals, regardless of financial circumstances, into a small residential community that is strongly rooted in southern california yet…

Education
9
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
10
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
11
The Central European University

Ceu is committed to promoting the values of open society and self-reflective critical thinking. it aims at excellence in the mastery of established knowledge, courage to pursue the creation of new knowledge in the humanities, the social…

International
12
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Denver; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
11/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Arizona State University: $60,000 · OtherArizona State UniversityPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $47,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $42,060 · Other+47 more: $893,059 · Other+47 moreUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $182,836 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DENVERTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $74,655 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND S…University of Notre Dame du Lac: $64,873 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacDUKE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $25,000 · EducationUniversity of Miami: $25,000 · EducationBRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $25,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationPALO ALTO UNIVERSITY INC: $25,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $25,000 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · Education+3 more: $15,000 · EducationNorthwestern University: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsTHRIVING FAMILIES: $20,000 · Human ServicesACKNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE: $20,000 · Health
Other$1,042,619Education$557,364Recreation & Sports$25,000Human Services$20,000Health$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $182,836 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $74,655 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $64,873 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetClaremont McKenna College: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRYN MAWR COLLEGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALO ALTO UNIVERSITY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $22,500 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetTHRIVING FAMILIES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetACKNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds Claremont McKenna College ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds BRYN MAWR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PALO ALTO UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mental Research Institute funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mental Research Institute. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mental Research Institute?

Find your warmest path to Mental Research Institute through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mental Research Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph