Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Melvin and Romona Morris Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Crime & Legal$81kEducation$79kHealth$43kHuman Services$36kCivil Rights$33kReligion$11kFood & Nutrition$10kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$11,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$817k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHERN FOUNDATION$11,000
MABLEAN EPHRIAM FOUNDATION$11,000
YOUNG CENTER FOR ACADEMIC & CULTURAL ENRICHMENT$10,500
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$10,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MABLEAN EPHRIAM FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%MABLEAN EPHRIAM FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%MABLEAN EPHRIAM FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%MABLEAN EPHRIAM FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%MABLEAN EPHRIAM FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%MABLEAN EPHRIAM FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR ACADEMIC & CULTURAL ENRICHMENT: $11k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR ACADEMIC & CULTURAL ENRICHMENT: $11k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR ACADEMIC & CULTURAL ENRICHMENT: $10k → 14%THE NILES FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$289k · 10 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

$289k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+21%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ME
    Mablean Ephriam Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $49k · revenue +46%
  • SJ
    SOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $28k · revenue +9%
  • CC
    COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $23k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • DO
    DREAMING OUT LOUD INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +105%
  • BB
    BEST BUDDIES
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • HA
    Hav A Sole
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +21%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
2
Pro-Equity Anti-Racism Institute
Philanthropy
3
Moms Against Racism and Injustice

MARI acts as a resource organization emphasizing the importance of our collective history through community education, and ultimately help eliminate racism and injustice.

Civil Rights
4
Impact Oakland Now
Community Improvement
5
Plug in South Los Angeles Plug in Ventures

Our mission is to enable and empower talented early-stage founders and entrepreneurs from underrepresented communities in and around Los Angeles and beyond.

Human Services
6
Painting a Different Picture Foundation

Painting a different picture foundation is ending malnutrition in infants and children by creating sustainable equal employment opportunities for their prarents.

7
The State of Black Arizona

The State of Black Arizona leads the production, synthesis, and socialization of actionable data and insights for all Arizonans, focusing on the Black community. We ensure that the factors leading to inequitable outcomes are identified,…

Human Services
8
Young Black Scholar Institute
Community Improvement
9
Enterprise for Youth

Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.

Youth Development
10
Asian American Advocacy Alliance
Community Improvement
11
Esq Apprentice Inc

To provide low-income youth of color with the tools needed to complete Californias legal apprenticeship program and become attorneys

Youth Development
12
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles Regional Food Bank and the most unlike its peers is Mablean Ephriam Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $21,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $17,214 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOUTHERN FOUNDATION — $11,000 · OtherSOUTHERN FOUNDATIONLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $10,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BAN…BEST BUDDIES — $5,000 · OtherBEST BUDDIESOASIS CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $5,000 · OtherOASIS CHRISTIAN CHURCHCHADWICK BOSEMAN FOUNDATION — $3,755 · Other+2 more — $5,958 · Other+2 moreEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $81,320 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVEHav A Sole — $5,000 · Civil RightsHav A SoleMablean Ephriam Foundation — $48,500 · Human ServicesMablean Ephriam FoundationYOUNG CENTER FOR ACADEMIC & CULTURAL ENR — $31,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG CENTER FOR ACADEMIC &…THE NILES FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE NILES FOUNDATIONCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE — $22,500 · HealthCOLORECTAL CA…PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $17,500 · HealthPANCREATIC CA…AUTISM SPEAKS INC — $3,000 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS…SOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE — $27,500 · Housing & ShelterSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC — $5,000 · EducationREACH FOUNDATION — $3,500 · EducationDREAMING OUT LOUD INC — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentPOSITIVE ACTION ORGANIZATION INC — $3,000 · International
Other$91,827Civil Rights$86,320Human Services$84,500Health$43,000Housing & Shelter$27,500Education$8,500Youth Development$5,000International$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $81,320 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMablean Ephriam Foundation — $48,500 over 6y, 8.5% of budgetYOUNG CENTER FOR ACADEMIC & CULTURAL ENR — $31,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE — $27,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE — $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDREAMING OUT LOUD INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHav A Sole — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREACH FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
  • Who funds Mablean Ephriam Foundation
  • Who funds YOUNG CENTER FOR ACADEMIC & CULTURAL ENR
  • Who funds SOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE
  • Who funds COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK
  • Who funds DREAMING OUT LOUD INC
  • Who funds Hav A Sole
  • Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC
  • Who funds THE NILES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds REACH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Melvin and Romona Morris Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Melvin and Romona Morris Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Melvin and Romona Morris Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph