· Private foundation
Melton Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $2,920 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,759 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,542 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,393 |
| Felipe Ignacio Moya Garcia | $2,380 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,380 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,379 |
| Ingrid Tabita Huaiquil Villegas | $2,379 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,354 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,354 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,320 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,101 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,101 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,101 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,049 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — across the US and around the world.
Your US giving — 16% of grant dollars ($99k). The 84% that went abroad ($521k) is mapped below.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 84% of all-years giving ($521k)
23 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
57 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 43 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IGIndividual grant recipient5× · 2017–2022 · $13k
- IGIndividual grant recipient6× · 2017–2024 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipient4× · 2017–2022 · $9k
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $4k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $4k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 257 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Melton Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Melton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.