Skip to content

California · Public charity

MedtechWomen

MedtechWomen's mission is to highlight and connect women experts in the medical technology and diagnostic industry to provide role models for women in the industry and educate them on what's happening at the cutting edge. Our significant activity is the MedtechVision conference which is a content driven forum around emerging…

$17k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
Organizations funded FY2021
100%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2021
$17,464
Largest grant, FY2021
$17,464
Organizations funded a year
1 to 1
FY2020 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
1
Total assets, FY2021
$328k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 100% of the organizations MedtechWomen funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20211$17k100%
FY20201$6kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Health$17kYouth Development$6k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2021, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Medtech Color$17,46414%
Girls Incorporated of Alameda County$5,95010%

Compare MedtechWomen with peer funders

About MedtechWomen

How much does MedtechWomen give?
MedtechWomen reported 1 grants totaling $17,464 in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 1 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2021.
What does MedtechWomen fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2021, its largest causes are Health (75%), Youth Development (25%).
Who are MedtechWomen's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2021: Medtech Color ($17k), Girls Incorporated of Alameda County ($6k).
Does MedtechWomen fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is MedtechWomen based?
MedtechWomen is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $2k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on MedtechWomen’s filings →

More from the funding graph