Skip to content

· Private foundation

Meca Wisconsin Police Canine Vest Foundation Inc Aka the Meca Foundation

The organization seeks to protect every police dog in the state of wisconsin by providing the dogs with bullet-proof and stab-proof vests.

$260k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$260kEducation$140kPublic Benefit$115kPhilanthropy$85kPublic Safety & Disaster$80k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$280k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,000
MOUNT HOREB POLICE DEPARTMENT$20,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION$20,000
NORTH FOND DU LAC POLICE DEPARTMENT$20,000
COLOMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S K-9 UNIT$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
CUBA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT$20,000
BOSCOBEL POLICE DEPARTMENT K-9 UNIT$20,000
OZAUKEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
CALUMET COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%CITY OF WAUKESHA: $20k → 5%CALUMET COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT: $20k → 6%GRAFTON K9 FOUNDATION: $20k → 6%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION: $20k → 7%COLOMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S K-9 UNIT: $20k → 8%NORTH FOND DU LAC POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20k → 9%CITY OF SHEBOYGAN FALLS: $20k → 9%CALEDONIA POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20k → 10%KENOSHA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT: $20k → 10%PORTAGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S COUNTY: $20k → 10%ROCK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT: $20k → 10%MOUNT HOREB POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20k → 10%BAYFIELD COUNTY: $25k → 11%TOMAHAWK POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20k → 11%OSHKOSH POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20k → 11%HOLMEN POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20k → 12%BOSCOBEL POLICE DEPARTMENT K-9 UNIT: $20k → 13%CITY OF ASHLAND: $50k → 14%CUDAHY POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20k → 17%GALENA POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20k → 9%MUSKEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SAFETY FUND INC: $20k → 5%MEQUON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $35k → 6%RACINE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE: $20k → 10%BAYFIELD COUNTY: $20k → 11%CUBA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20k → 13%CITY OF ASHLAND: $20k → 14%SOUTH MILWAUKEE POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20k → 17%MEQUON POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20k → 6%CITY OF ASHLAND: $20k → 14%MEQUON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 6%MEQUON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%OZAUKEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT: $20k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/3
Grantees still filing
3/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF ASHLAND: $90,000 · OtherCITY OF ASHLANDBAYFIELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES: $45,000 · OtherBAYFIELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICESPORTAGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S COUNTY: $20,000 · OtherOZAUKEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherNORTH FOND DU LAC POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20,000 · OtherMOUNT HOREB POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherBOSCOBEL POLICE DEPARTMENT K-9 UNIT: $20,000 · OtherKENOSHA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT: $20,000 · OtherCITY OF SHEBOYGAN FALLS: $20,000 · OtherROCK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherCOLOMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S K-9 UNIT: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherGRAFTON K9 FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · OtherCUBA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20,000 · OtherCALUMET COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT: $20,000 · OtherSOUTH MILWAUKEE POLICE DEPARTMENT: $20,000 · OtherRACINE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE: $20,000 · OtherCITY OF WAUKESHA: $20,000 · OtherMEQUON-THIENSVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 · PhilanthropyMEQUON-THIENSV…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUN…MUSKEGO POLICE PUBLIC SAFETY FUND: $20,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$575,000Philanthropy$85,000Public Safety & Disaster$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEQUON-THIENSVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 over 3y, 20% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEQUON-THIENSVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE FOX VALLEY REGION INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSKEGO POLICE PUBLIC SAFETY FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Meca Wisconsin Police Canine Vest Foundation Inc Aka the Meca Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Meca Wisconsin Police Canine Vest Foundation Inc Aka the Meca Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Meca Wisconsin Police Canine Vest Foundation Inc Aka the Meca’s filings →

    More from the funding graph