Skip to content

· Private foundation

Meade School District 46-1 Charitab

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$61kArts & Culture$750Science & Tech$750Youth Development$500
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$297k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF SD$3,000
SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIV$2,250
SD SCHOOL OF MINES AND TECHNOLOGY$2,250
BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY$1,500
GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
RANGER COLLEGE$1,500
Individual grant recipient$750
WALDORF UNIVERSITY$750
SHERIDAN COLLEGE$750
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY$750
DORDT UNIVERSITY$750
MOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY$750
REED COLLEGE$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MESA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $750 → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $750 → 11%MINN STATE UNIV: $750 → 15%CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE: $750 → 10%EAST TEXAS AM: $750 → 14%RANGER COLLEGE: $2k → 15%DORDT UNIVERSITY: $750 → 8%WALDORF UNIVERSITY: $750 → 10%IOWA CENTRAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $750 → 13%REED COLLEGE: $750 → 12%GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $750 → 13%SD STATE UNIV: $750 → 12%SHERIDAN COLLEGE: $750 → 10%STURGIS BROWN HIGH SCHOOL: $750 → 8%AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY: $750 → 9%DAKOTA STATE UNIVESITY: $3k → 10%BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%MOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY: $750 → 11%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIV: $2k → 13%MITCHELL TECH: $2k → 14%SD SCHOOL OF MINES AND TECHNOLOGY: $2k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SD: $3k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $750 → 11%AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY: $750 → 9%DAKOTA STATE: $750 → 10%BLACK HILLS STATE UNIV: $2k → 11%MOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY: $750 → 11%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIV: $2k → 13%MITCHELL TECH: $2k → 14%SD SCHOOL OF MINES AND TECHNOLOGY: $2k → 14%UNIVERSTIY OF SD: $750 → 20%MAKAYLA KEFFELER: $750 → 9%BLACK HILLS STATE UNIV: $750 → 11%KADEN PHILLIPS: $750 → 11%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIV: $2k → 13%ELIZABETH ORTIZ: $750 → 14%SD SCHOOL OF MINES: $750 → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SD: $750 → 20%MADISON MASCHINO: $750 → 11%KADEN NELSON: $750 → 13%ELLA JOHNSON: $750 → 14%WREN JACOBS: $750 → 14%SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIV: $750 → 13%SD SCHOOL OF MINES: $750 → 14%SD STATE UNIV: $750 → 13%BRADY BUCHHOLZ: $750 → 14%TRINITY LEGNER: $750 → 13%SD SCHOOL OF MINES: $750 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ND
MN
MA
OR
WY
SD
IA
OH
CA
CO
AZ
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Meade School District 46-1 Charitab’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 73% of the giving stays in SD; by stated purpose, 69%.

Meade School District 46-1 Charitablessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$29k · 9 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
30

Total granted

$29k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+21%

Still filing today

22%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SD
    SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIV
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k
  • BH
    BLACK HILLS STATE UNIV
    3× · 2022–2025 · $4k
  • SS
    SD SCHOOL OF MINES AND TECHNOLOGY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $4k

Funded once

  • SS
    SD SCHOOL OF MINES
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • SB
    STURGIS BROWN HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIV: $6,750 · OtherSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVBLACK HILLS STATE UNIV: $3,750 · OtherBLACK HILLS STATE UNIVSD SCHOOL OF MINES AND TECHNOLOGY: $3,750 · OtherSD SCHOOL OF MINES AND TECHNOLOGYUNIVERSITY OF SD: $3,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SDIndividual grant recipient: $3,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherSD SCHOOL OF MINES: $2,250 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING: $2,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,250 · Other+33 more: $24,750 · Other+33 moreAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $1,500 · EducationAUGUSTANA UN…Grand Canyon University: $1,500 · EducationGrand Canyon…MOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationMOUNT MARTY …REED INSTITUTE: $750 · EducationREED INSTITU…CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE: $750 · EducationCONCORDIA UN…DORDT UNIVERSITY: $750 · EducationDORDT UNIVER…
Other$56,250Education$6,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREED INSTITUTE: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDORDT UNIVERSITY: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Grand Canyon University ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT MARTY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds REED INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY IRVINE ↗
  • Who funds DORDT UNIVERSITY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Meade School District 46-1 Charitab funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Meade School District 46-1 Charitab. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Reed Institute: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Meade School District 46-1 Charitab?

Find your warmest path to Meade School District 46-1 Charitab through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Meade School District 46-1 Charitab’s filings →

More from the funding graph