Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

McLaren Greater Lansing

Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

$1.1M
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Recreation & Sports$5.8MEducation$1.1MHealth$388kCommunity Improvement$246kFood & Nutrition$205kArts & Culture$110kHuman Services$107kYouth Development$85kOther$0
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $63k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$827M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$1,000,000
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$22,825
POTTER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$10,000
GREATER LANSING FOOD$10,000
BOYS' & GIRLS CLUB OF LANSING$10,000
SOUTH LANSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION$10,000
CARE FREE MEDICAL$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $112k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CRISTO REY COMMUNITY CENTER: $17k → 9%SOUTH LANSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $40k → 16%SOUTH LANSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $20k → 16%SOUTH LANSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $15k → 16%SOUTH LANSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $10k → 16%SOUTH LANSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.8M · 24 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
10

Total granted

$6.8M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+15%

Still filing today

63%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthYouth DevelopmentEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $4.0M · revenue +168%
  • LE
    LANSING ECONOMIC AREA PARTNERSHIP
    5× · 2017–2021 · $220k · revenue ×12
  • GL
    GREATER LANSING FOOD BANK
    7× · 2017–2024 · $110k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • UC
    UNIVERSITY CORPORATE RESEARCH PARK I INC
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M · revenue -231%
  • ER
    EATON RAPIDS MEDICAL CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $103k · revenue +39%
  • UC
    UNIVERSITY CLUB OF MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

2
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

3
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
4
Mclaren Greater Lansing

Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
5
Michigan State Medical Society

Promote a health care environment that supports physicians in caring for and enhancing the health of michigan citizens through science, quality, and ethics in the practice of medicine.

6
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

7
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
8
Michigan Pharmacists Association

To encourage and support its members as professionals responsible for the delivery of patient-focused care.

9
Michigan Farmers Market Association

Mifma supports the viability of all community-driven marketplaces so that they can connect all consumers to local farms and businesses.

Food & Nutrition
10
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

11
Ingham Health Plan Corporation

To act as a vehicle to provide access to organized systems of health care and improve the health status of individuals in the community.

Health
12
Mymichigan Medical Group

Creating healthy communities - together

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lansing Regional Chamber of Commerce and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr15%24%20–35yr16%33%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr15%2%20–35yr16%69%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
10%
193/1,951

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $4,000,000 · EducationMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION+1 more — $10,000 · EducationMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $1,681,836 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY CORPORATE RESEARCH PARK I INC — $1,000,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY CORPORATE RESEARCH PARK I INC+18 more — $624,188 · Other+18 moreLANSING ECONOMIC AREA PARTNERSHIP — $220,000 · Community ImprovementCAPITAL AREA HEALTH ALLIANCE — $36,000 · Community ImprovementEATON RAPIDS MEDICAL CENTER — $103,000 · HealthCARE FREE MEDICAL INC — $60,100 · Health+2 more — $10,000 · HealthSOUTH LANSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION — $95,000 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of Ingham Eaton & Clinton Counties — $16,500 · Human ServicesGREATER LANSING FOOD BANK — $110,000 · Food & NutritionBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LANSING — $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentELE'S PLACE INC — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAPITAL AREA SOCCER LEAGUE — $5,000 · Youth Development
Education$4,010,000Other$3,306,024Community Improvement$256,000Health$173,100Human Services$111,500Food & Nutrition$110,000Youth Development$90,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $4,000,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetLANSING ECONOMIC AREA PARTNERSHIP — $220,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetGREATER LANSING FOOD BANK — $110,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEATON RAPIDS MEDICAL CENTER — $103,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH LANSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION — $95,000 over 6y, 27% of budgetCARE FREE MEDICAL INC — $60,100 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetPOTTER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $60,030 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LANSING — $60,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetIMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER — $50,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY CLUB OF MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetACTIVE LIVING FOR ALL — $40,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetSt Vincent Catholic Charities — $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC — $36,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL AREA HEALTH ALLIANCE — $36,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetLANSING REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $25,560 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetELE'S PLACE INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCatholic Charities of Ingham Eaton & Clinton Counties — $16,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLansing Promise — $10,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTRI-COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL CONTROL AUTHORITY — $8,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCAPITAL AREA DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA SOCCER LEAGUE — $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CORPORATE RESEARCH PARK I INC
  • Who funds LANSING ECONOMIC AREA PARTNERSHIP
  • Who funds GREATER LANSING FOOD BANK
  • Who funds EATON RAPIDS MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds SOUTH LANSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds CARE FREE MEDICAL INC
  • Who funds POTTER PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LANSING
  • Who funds IMPRESSION 5 SCIENCE CENTER
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CLUB OF MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ACTIVE LIVING FOR ALL
  • Who funds St Vincent Catholic Charities
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA HEALTH ALLIANCE
  • Who funds LANSING REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
  • Who funds ELE'S PLACE INC
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of Ingham Eaton & Clinton Counties
  • Who funds Lansing Promise
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL CONTROL AUTHORITY
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA SOCCER LEAGUE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Capital Region Community FoundationMI26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Capital Region Community Foundation · Lansing Economic Area Partnership · Joe D Pentecost Foundation · Dart Foundation fka Solid Waste Management Foundation · Lansing Rotary Foundation · Louis Berkowitz Family Foundation Inc · Delta Dental Plan of Michigan Inc · Delta Dental Fund · United Way of South Central Michigan · Consumers Energy Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Jackson Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization McLaren Greater Lansing funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $152k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph