Skip to content

· Public charity

McKenzie River Trust

Acquire and manage land and conservation easements through purchase and donation to ensure long term conservation of clean water, fish and wildlife habitat, and other community values.

$405k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$354k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$364kEnvironment$160kCivil Rights$10kArts & Culture$7k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
  • $250k+1 grant · $354k
$353,632
Median grant
1
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OR PARKS & RECREATION DEPT$353,632
CONF TRIBES OF SILETZ$51,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CONF TRIBES OF GRAND RONDE: $27k → 11%OR PARKS & RECREATION DEPT: $354k → 14%CITY OF EUGENE PARKS AND REC: $10k → 15%CONF TRIBES OF SILETZ: $51k → 16%LONG TOM WATERSHED COUNCIL: $7k → 15%CONF TRIBES OF SILETZ: $10k → 16%MIDDLE FORK WILLAMETTE: $6k → 15%XCAPE DANCE COMPANY: $7k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OR PARKS & RECREATION DEPT: $353,632 · OtherOR PARKS & RECREATION DEPTCONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ INDIANS OF OREGON: $60,925 · OtherCONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ INDIANS OF OREGONConfederated Tribes of Grand Ronde: $26,791 · OtherConfederated Tribes of Grand Ronde+1 more: $10,000 · OtherECOSTUDIES INSTITUTE: $70,000 · EnvironmentECOSTUDIES INSTIT…LONG TOM WATERSHED COUNCIL: $6,550 · EnvironmentLONG TOM WATERSHE…MIDDLE FORK WILLAMETTE WATERSHED COUNCIL: $5,729 · EnvironmentMIDDLE FORK WILLA…XCAPE DANCE COMPANY: $6,550 · Arts & Culture
Other$451,348Environment$82,279Arts & Culture$6,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetECOSTUDIES INSTITUTE: $70,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLONG TOM WATERSHED COUNCIL: $6,550 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMIDDLE FORK WILLAMETTE WATERSHED COUNCIL: $5,729 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McKenzie River Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McKenzie River Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • Middle Fork Willamette Watershed Council: 49% of income from government
  • Long Tom Watershed Council: 39% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to McKenzie River Trust?

Find your warmest path to McKenzie River Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on McKenzie River’s filings →

More from the funding graph