· Private foundation
Mb Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GURUJI KA MANDIR | $9,000 |
| VEERAYATAN INTERNATIONAL INC | $5,100 |
| INTERNATIONAL MISSION OF MERCY USA | $2,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MSMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING4× · 2020–2023 · $142k
- SJST JUDE ON INTERNET4× · 2020–2023 · $130k
- IGIndividual grant recipient3× · 2020–2022 · $40k
Funded once
- IMINTERNATIONAL MISSION OF MERCYone grant, 2022 · $7k
- EFEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICAone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -17%
- SASANJAY ANAND CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -38%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Foster & protect the religious diversity and pluralism, protecting, preserving, rejuvenating and disseminating information about non aggressive religious traditions
Guruji edison mandir sevadars (hereinafter referred to as "gems- or the "organization") is a 501(c)(3) non-profit, non-governmental, not-for-profit corporation incorporated in the state of new jersey on march 4, 2019. the objective of the…
Isso conduct religious services and activities following the teachings and principles of swaminarayan sect of a hindu religion founded and ordained by lord shri sahajanand swami, also known as lord swaminarayan.
Conducting yoga seminar and promoting yoga.
Providing medical services to needy in india.
Our mission is to introduce the extraordinary works of sri vaishnava acharyas and azhwars to the reading public at large, both in imdia and other countries through the medium of english language in the form of e books.
The mission is to raise funds from the donors in the united states that will benefit bhagwan mahaveer viklang sahayata samiti and the associated jaipur foot program in jaipur, india which provides prosthetic legs and feet for those in…
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GURUJI KA MANDIR ↗
- Who funds VEERAYATAN INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds SANJAY ANAND CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
- Who funds GURUJI KI ESANGAT ↗
- Who funds SPREAD THE JOY INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Mb Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mb Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Epilepsy Foundation of America: 22% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Mb’s filings →