Skip to content

· Public charity

Mattan Basseter Inc

Based upon need, aid given to families who could not afford yeshiva tuition.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$109k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$5.5MHuman Services$857kEducation$482kYouth Development$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 28 grants below total $966,633, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,053,121 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $86,488 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $54k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $386k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $527k
$24,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAGEN DAVID YESHIVA$109,125
YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC$97,500
YESHIVAT ATERET TORAH$95,320
BEER MIRIAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$78,845
AHI EZER CONGREGATION$77,400
YESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC$68,950
YESODOT HATORAH$48,950
MILL BASIN YESHIVA ACADEMY$45,850
YESHIVAT OHR HATORAH$44,700
YESHIVAT LEV TORAH$39,850
YESHIVA OF FLATBUSH$39,220
YESHIVAS DARCHEI TORAH$26,100
BNOS ROCHEL$24,350
YESHIVAT KINYAN TORAH$24,000
NEFESH GIRLS SCHOOL$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $836k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $10k → 6%BEER MIRIAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $175k → 20%BEER MIRIAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $79k → 20%BEER MIRIAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $50k → 20%BEER MIRIAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $25k → 20%BEER MIRIAM: $185k → 20%BEER MIRIAM: $141k → 20%BEER MIRIAM: $79k → 20%BEER MIRIAM: $69k → 20%BEER MIRIAM: $22k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.7M · 29 repeat orgs$223k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
13

Total granted

$6.7M
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+24%

Still filing today

38%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    BEER MIRIAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $826k · revenue ×27 · 45% of their budget
  • YS
    YESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $583k · revenue +10%
  • YD
    YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $529k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • DD
    DARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $24k · revenue +32%
  • HK
    HKY KOL YAAKAB INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +19%
  • MT
    MERKAZ - THE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
3
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
4
Yeshivat Mekor Chaim Inc

High school, offering academic classes in english, history, math, and science, as well as a full array of courses in judaic studies and co-curricular activities such as physical education and classes in the arts.

Education
5
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
6
Yeshiva Yesodei Hachaim

To provide secondary high school education in Brooklyn, NY

—
7
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
8
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
9
Stein Yeshiva of Lincoln Park

School for providing jewish education

Religion
10
Bais Yaakov Ohel Esther Inc

Operation of an educational institution for preschool and elementary school-aged children, providing both religous and secular education.

—
11
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
12
Passaic Hebrew Institute

YBH of Passaic, a K-8 yeshiva in Passaic, New Jersey, emphasizes the primacy of Torah and Yiras Shomayim and offers a serious and comprehensive General Studies curriculum. YBH stresses the importance of middos tovos and acting with…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Shaare Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ilan High School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH: $921,959 · OtherMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAHATERET TORAH CENTER: $641,310 · OtherATERET TORAH CENTERYESHIVAT OR HATORAH: $442,450 · OtherYESHIVAT OR HATORAHAHI EZER CONGREGATION: $416,070 · OtherAHI EZER CONGREGATIONBET YAAKOV OROT SARAH INC: $339,025 · OtherBET YAAKOV OROT SARAH INCBNOS ROCHEL: $323,225 · OtherBNOS ROCHELYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSH: $313,170 · OtherYESHIVAH OF FLATBUSHYESHIVAH TALMUD TORAH OF CROWN HEIGHTS: $201,650 · Other+21 more: $540,224 · Other+21 moreYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $582,524 · EducationYESHIVAT SHAARE…SHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS OF BROOKLYN: $157,595 · EducationSHULAMITH SCHOO…BARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $72,600 · EducationBARKAI FOUNDATI…BET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $37,373 · EducationILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $34,950 · Education+6 more: $79,450 · Education+6 moreYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $529,275 · ReligionYESHIVAT DARCHE…Yeshivat Lev Torah: $229,650 · ReligionYeshivat Lev To…YESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $120,375 · ReligionYESHIVAT OHEL T…+3 more: $34,338 · ReligionBEER MIRIAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $825,670 · Human ServicesBEER MIRIAM C…+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $21,600 · Youth Development
Other$4,139,083Education$964,492Religion$913,638Human Services$835,670Youth Development$21,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEER MIRIAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $825,670 over 9y, 45% of budgetYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $582,524 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $529,275 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $229,650 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS OF BROOKLYN: $157,595 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $120,375 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $72,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBEER HAGOLAH INSTITUTES INC: $38,575 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $37,373 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $34,950 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA DERECH HATORAH-YESHIVAT MIZRACHI LBANIM: $31,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION: $24,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $21,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN YOM TOV INC: $20,200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHKY KOL YAAKAB INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTOURO UNIVERSITY: $12,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLS: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Chabad Lubavitch Aruba INC: $6,338 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $6,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGESHER YEHUDA INC: $5,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEER MIRIAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC ↗
  • Who funds Yeshivat Lev Torah ↗
  • Who funds SHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS OF BROOKLYN ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT OHEL TORAH ↗
  • Who funds BARKAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BEER HAGOLAH INSTITUTES INC ↗
  • Who funds BET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC ↗
  • Who funds ILAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA DERECH HATORAH-YESHIVAT MIZRACHI LBANIM ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MIKLAT COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds DARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN YOM TOV INC ↗
  • Who funds HKY KOL YAAKAB INC ↗
  • Who funds TOURO UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED ↗
  • Who funds MAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OF CENTRAL QUEENS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY51.8× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc · E R G Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Mary & Abe Sutton Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mattan Basseter Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mattan Basseter Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mattan Basseter Inc?

Find your warmest path to Mattan Basseter Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mattan Basseter’s filings →

More from the funding graph