Skip to content
Massachusetts Health & Hospital Assoc Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Massachusetts Health & Hospital Assoc Inc

To advance the health of individuals and communities by serving as the leading voice for all massachusetts hospitals and healthcare systems and to help them provide high quality, cost-effective and equitable patient care.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$24MPublic Safety & Disaster$20kArts & Culture$5kCommunity Improvement$5kPublic Benefit$5k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $7,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $45,730 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $38,230 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTH EQUITY COMPACT INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 61% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MASSACHSETTS HEALTH QUALITY PARTNERS: $10k → 8%Alliance for Inclusion and Prevention: $9k → 16%Texas Hospital Association: $10k → 10%Coalition to Protect America's Health: $10k → 14%Florida Hospital Association: $10k → 19%THE COMMONWEALTH INSTITUTE: $5k → 8%HEALTH EQUITY COMPACT INC: $8k → 16%FUND FOR POLITICAL EDUCATION: $5k → 14%COALITION FOR THE HEALTH ADV & RES IN MA MASS BIOTECH COUN: $25k → 8%HEALTH EQUITY COMPACT INC: $8k → 16%UNITED STATES CAPITOL AND HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24M · 3 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +343% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$24M
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+343%
+24%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    Coalition to Protect Patient Safety
    2× · 2018–2019 · $24M
  • CT
    COALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE
    2× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +343%
  • HE
    HEALTH EQUITY COMPACT INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k

Funded once

  • MB
    MASSACHUSETTS BIOTECHNOLOGY COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +5%
  • FH
    FLORIDA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +33%
  • TH
    Texas Hospital Association
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Health & Hospital Assoc Inc

To advance the health of individuals and communities by serving as the leading voice for all massachusetts hospitals and healthcare systems and to help them provide high quality, cost-effective and equitable patient care.

—
2
Integrated Healthcare Association

Iha's mission is to bring the healthcare community together to solve industry-wide challenges that stand in the way of high-value care. as a non-profit industry association, we use objective data, our decades of expertise, and our unique…

—
3
Minnesota Hospital Association

Advance the health of individuals and communities through leadership, advocacy and collaboration on behalf of minnesota hospitals and health systems. vision: minnesotans are healthy and have access to the right care at the right time in…

Community Improvement
4
American Health Law Association

The mission of the american health law association is to deliver authoritative educational content and serve as a professional home for all who engage with health law.

—
5
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
6
Massachusetts Association of Health Plans Inc

To promote high-quality, affordable, and equitable health care in massachusetts through advocacy, education and health policy research.

—
7
America's Essential Hospitals

America's essential hospitals champions excellence in health care for all, regardless of social or economic circumstance, and advances the work of hospitals and health systems committed to ensuring access to care and optimal health for…

—
8
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
9
Massachusetts Public Health Association

Mpha promotes a healthy massachusetts through advocacy, education, community organizing and coalition building. we are leaders in the movement to create health equity by addressing the root causes of health and wellness. we promote…

Health
10
National Coalition On Health Care

The mission of the national coalition on health care (nchc) is to support research and analysis, develop and promote policy solutions, build consensus, and engage the public in order to ensure that america has a high quality health system…

Health
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
Healthcare Purchaser Alliance of Maine

The alliance is a collaborative of private employers and public trusts dedicated to lowering healthcare costs and improving quality. through collective and innovative strategies, alliance members drive the change they want to see in…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Hospital Association; the most unlike its peers is United States Capitol Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Coalition to Protect Patient Safety: $24,338,444 · OtherCoalition to Protect Patient Safety+4 more: $48,500 · OtherCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE: $20,000 · HealthHEALTH EQUITY COMPACT INC: $15,000 · HealthTexas Hospital Association: $10,000 · HealthMassachusetts Health Quality Partners Inc: $10,000 · EducationTHE WOMEN'S EDGE: $5,000 · EducationUNITED STATES CAPITOL HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,150 · Arts & Culture
Other$24,386,944Health$45,000Education$15,000Arts & Culture$5,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMASSACHUSETTS BIOTECHNOLOGY COUNCIL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTH EQUITY COMPACT INC: $15,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetFLORIDA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTexas Hospital Association: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMassachusetts Health Quality Partners Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALLIANCE FOR INCLUSION AND PREVENTION INC: $8,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED STATES CAPITOL HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,150 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Hospital Association: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S EDGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Massachusetts Health & Hospital Assoc Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Massachusetts Health & Hospital Assoc Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 73%
  • Alliance for Inclusion and Prevention Inc: 73% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Massachusetts Health & Hospital Assoc’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home