· Public charity
Masonry Industry Training Association of Southern California Training Trust
The Masonry Industry Training Association Trust is an organization that supports and promotes training for careers in the Masonry Industry.Mission:To introduce and promote, to persons of all ages, careers in the Masonry Industry.To provide opportunities, through training, to underprivileged and at-risk youth, educate them to the fact…
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 100% of Masonry Industry Training Association of Southern California Training Trust’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $141,282 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $147,289 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,007 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $135k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Masonry Industry Training Ass | $134,600 |
| Val Verde Adult Center | $6,682 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MIMasonry Industry Training Ass2× · 2024–2025 · $300k
- WHWest Hills High School4× · 2019–2022 · $40k
- VVVal Verde Adult Center2× · 2024–2025 · $18k
Funded once
- MIMasonry Industry Training Asone grant, 2018 · $75k
- CCCHAFFEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICTone grant, 2021 · $30k
- EAEscondido Adult Schoolone grant, 2024 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2018–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Masonry Industry Training Association of Southern California Training Trust?
Find your warmest path to Masonry Industry Training Association of Southern California Training Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.