Skip to content
Masonic Home of Missouri at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Masonic Home of Missouri

To assist eligible adults and children in need by practicing the principles of freemasonry.

$2.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
60
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$1.0MRecreation & Sports$715kEducation$570kFood & Nutrition$512kHuman Services$384kHealth$103kHousing & Shelter$92kPhilanthropy$88kOther$0
02FY2025 · 60 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 60 grants below total $993,753, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,597,583 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,603,830 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k29 grants · $204k
  • $10k–50k29 grants · $656k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $133k
$10,947
Median grant
1
States reached
$196M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE LLC$77,119
CHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SW MISSOURI$56,250
CLARK COUNTY R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT$46,500
KIRKSVILLE R-III SCHOOL DISTRICT$45,121
CITY OF GREENVILLE$45,000
GREENVILLE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT$44,910
KEARNEY ENRICHMENT COUNCIL$42,690
CLINTON COUNTY R-III SCHOOL DISTRICT$36,000
THE LAWSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$35,700
CAPE GIRARDEAU PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$33,000
FAIRFAX OPTIMIST CLUB OF FAIRFAX MO$30,000
WILLARD CHILDRENS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$25,200
TURNEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$22,500
CLEARWATER FAMILY YOUTH CENTER$21,435
CARE TO LEARN$20,823
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $192k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%KEARNEY ENRICHMENT COUNCIL: $43k → 8%FOSTER ADOPT CONNECT INC: $6k → 23%THE FORGOTTEN INITIATIVE: $7k → 11%ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 21%LIONS SHARE BACKPACK PROGRAM: $8k → 23%KEARNEY ENRICHMENT COUNCIL: $23k → 8%KEARNEY ENRICHMENT COUNCIL: $11k → 8%ST LOUIS BEREAVEMENT CENTER FOR YOUNG PEOPLE: $11k → 11%FOSTER ADOPT CONNECT INC: $14k → 15%COMMUNITY CHILD CARE CENTER: $6k → 15%EAGLE FLIGHT MINISTRIES: $5k → 15%HOUSE OF COMPASSION: $6k → 15%CARE TO LEARN: $21k → 15%CARE TO LEARN: $11k → 15%HONOR FLIGHT NETWORK OF THE OZARKS: $7k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 57 repeat orgs$876k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

57 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
52

Total granted

$2.6M
$564k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+9%

Still filing today

16%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $312k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    Foundation for Springfield Public Schools
    7× · 2019–2025 · $66k · revenue +39%
  • CT
    Care to Learn
    3× · 2023–2025 · $48k · revenue +10%
  • HF
    HONOR FLIGHT NETWORK OF KANSAS CITY
    2× · 2018–2024 · $25k · revenue +39% · 32% of their budget

Funded once

  • CR
    CANTON R-V SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2024 · $45k
  • RP
    ROCK PORT YOUTH ATHLETICS ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $45k
  • PH
    PARK HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $42k · revenue -8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Missouri Accreditation of Programs for Children & Youth

Promotion of child care excellence in missouri

Education
2
Missouri Children's Trust Fund

Child abuse/neglect prevention

—
3
Missouri Centers for Independent Living
—
4
Missouri Council of School Administrator

Representation and support of missouri educators.

—
5
St Louis County Police Welfare Assoc

Assistance to police officers and their families.

Human Services
6
Missouri Retired Teachers Foundation

Provide educational opportunities for members of the missouri retired teachers association and to provide teacher classroom grants and support staff grants in the state of missouri

Education
7
Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund

Children's services fund ('csf') is an innovative way to support child well-being projects. while we are funded by a jackson county sales tax, we are a stand-alone organization led by an independent board. (continued on schedule o)we are…

Human Services
8
Franklin County Children & Families Comm Unity Resource Board Association

To encourage development and full utilization of community resources to build and sustain a comprehensive mental health system of care for children and families in Franklin County, MO.

Human Services
9
St Martin's Child Center

Providing day care services to infants and children of low income families in northern st. louis county, missouri

—
10
Kids Win Missouri

Kids Win Missouri furthers child well-being by advancing the health, education, safety and development of Missouri children and their families, especially those who are at-risk because of poverty, abuse, neglect, racial inequities or other…

Human Services
11
Children's Home Society of Missouri

The agency's overarching philosophy is based in the neurosequential model of therapeutics (nmt), developed by dr. bruce perry. nmt is a trauma-informed, developmentally sensitive approach to understanding the impact of a child's history on…

Human Services
12
Blake Wagner Foundation
Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The St Louis Bereavement Center for Young People; the most unlike its peers is Paws 4 Autism. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 133 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/43
Grantees still filing
24/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREENVILLE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT: $217,904 · OtherGREENVILLE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICTCLARK COUNTY R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICT: $189,522 · OtherCLARK COUNTY R-1 SCHOOL DISTRICTCLINTON COUNTY R-III SCHOOL DISTRICT: $126,262 · OtherFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $115,200 · OtherCITY OF GREENVILLE: $98,000 · Other+100 more: $2,048,722 · Other+100 moreKEARNEY ENRICHMENT COUNCIL: $75,690 · Human ServicesCare to Learn: $48,294 · Human ServicesFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC: $19,800 · Human ServicesHONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS: $17,108 · Human ServicesAnnie Malone Children and Family Service: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE ST LOUIS BEREAVEMENT CENTER FOR YOUNG PEOPLE: $10,947 · Human ServicesMANSFIELD AREA COMMUNITY BETTERMENT ORGANIZATION: $8,100 · Human Services+4 more: $23,767 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSOURIINC: $81,800 · PhilanthropyLAWSON COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $77,200 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC: $15,910 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SOUTHWEST MISSO: $124,050 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT 360 YOUTH SERVICES INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentPARK HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $42,000 · EducationCAPE GIRARDEAU PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $33,000 · EducationSCHOOL DISTRICT OF RAYTOWN ED FOUNDATION INC: $12,420 · EducationCARTHAGE R-9 SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,194 · EducationMARY LEE JOHNSTON COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER: $7,500 · EducationSHERIFF ARNOTT'S DISTINGUISHED POSSE INC: $6,000 · EducationCAPITAL CITY AREA COUNCIL FOR SPECIAL SERVICES: $5,625 · EducationFoundation for Springfield Public Schools: $66,486 · HealthRILEY EQUINE CENTER INC: $14,970 · HealthJUDEVINE INC: $7,200 · HealthSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $77,119 · Housing & ShelterROCKY CREEK YOUTH RANCH INCORPORATE: $9,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,795,610Human Services$218,706Philanthropy$174,910Youth Development$139,050Education$116,739Health$88,656Housing & Shelter$86,119

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SOUTHWEST MISSO: $124,050 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSOURIINC: $81,800 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetKEARNEY ENRICHMENT COUNCIL: $75,690 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetPTA MISSOURI CONGRESS: $75,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetFoundation for Springfield Public Schools: $66,486 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetCare to Learn: $48,294 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPARK HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $42,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetOPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL: $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGREATER SAINT LOUIS HONOR FLIGHT INC: $26,075 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetHONOR FLIGHT NETWORK OF KANSAS CITY: $24,632 over 2y, 32% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI: $21,434 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC: $19,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHONOR FLIGHT OF THE OZARKS: $17,108 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC: $15,910 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnnie Malone Children and Family Service: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPROJECT 360 YOUTH SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetL-Life Food Pantry: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT EMERGENCY SHELTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRILEY EQUINE CENTER INC: $14,970 over 1y, 21% of budgetSCHOOL DISTRICT OF RAYTOWN ED FOUNDATION INC: $12,420 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCARTHAGE R-9 SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10,194 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetALPHAPOINTE: $8,363 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI CONGRESS OF PARENTS AND TEACHERS: $8,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMARY LEE JOHNSTON COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJUDEVINE INC: $7,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Forgotten Initiative: $6,600 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSHERIFF ARNOTT'S DISTINGUISHED POSSE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetCommunity Child Care Center: $5,850 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMissouri Congress of Parents and Teachers: $5,772 over 1y, 15% of budgetCAPITAL CITY AREA COUNCIL FOR SPECIAL SERVICES: $5,625 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $5,550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLE FLIGHT MINISTRIES: $5,250 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetGREAT RIVER HONOR FLIGHT: $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SOUTHWEST MISSO ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHWEST MISSOURIINC ↗
  • Who funds LAWSON COMMUNITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds KEARNEY ENRICHMENT COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds PTA MISSOURI CONGRESS ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Springfield Public Schools ↗
  • Who funds Care to Learn ↗
  • Who funds PARK HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAPE GIRARDEAU PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds GREATER SAINT LOUIS HONOR FLIGHT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Commerce Bancshares F…Veterans United Found…Project Lead the Way …Arvest FoundationOzarks Food Harvest I…American Water Charit…Voluntary Interdistri…Project Lead the Way …The National Associat…St Louis Community Fo…World Wide Technology…
Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO48× affinity28 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Veterans United Foundation · Project Lead the Way Inc · Arvest Foundation · Ozarks Food Harvest Inc · American Water Charitable Foundationinc · Voluntary Interdistrict Choice Corporation · Project Lead the Way Inc · The National Association for the Exchange of Industrial Resources Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Masonic Home of Missouri funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Masonic Home of Missouri. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 133 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Masonic Home of Missouri’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home