Skip to content

· Public charity

Masonic Charity Foundation of New Mexico Inc

Charity and new mexico communities outreach

$218k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Membership Benefit$107kCommunity Improvement$84kPhilanthropy$55kReligion$23kEducation$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $76,543, the rows itemized in this filing. The $218,102 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $141,559 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
$8,160
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LINCOLN COU$25,000
VALLEY OF LAS CRUCES LEARNING CENTE$12,190
PORTALES LODGE NO 26$10,500
CHAMA LODGE NO 17 AF7AM$8,160
MONTEZUMA LODGE NO 1 AF&AM$8,000
SOCORRO LODGE NO 9 AF&AM$7,393
LA CUEVA FIRE DEPARTMENT$5,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SANDOVAL LODGE NO 76 AF&AM: $12k → 10%MONTEZUMA LODGE NO 1 AF&AM: $11k → 12%ALBUQUERQUE LODGE NO 60 AF&AM: $10k → 14%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LINCOLN COU: $30k → 17%CLOVIS LODGE NO 40 AF&AM: $9k → 18%PORTALES LODGE NO 26: $11k → 18%VALLEY LODGE NO 69: $6k → 18%BENT LODGE NO 42 AF&AM: $10k → 18%EUNICE LODGE NO 67: $6k → 19%SILVER CITY LODGE NO 8 AF&AM: $6k → 20%CHAMA LODGE NO 17 AF7AM: $8k → 22%VALLEY OF LAS CRUCES LEARNING CENTE: $12k → 23%SOCORRO LODGE NO 9 AF&AM: $7k → 25%MASONIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION: $49k → 9%MSA DISASTER RELIEF: $17k → 8%UNION LODGE NO 4 AF&AM: $5k → 10%MONTEZUMA LODGE NO 1 AF&AM: $8k → 12%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LINCOLN COU: $25k → 17%LOVINGTON LODGE NO 46 AF&AM: $6k → 19%MASONIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION: $34k → 9%MSA DISASTER RELIEF: $6k → 8%LA CUEVA FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5k → 10%PAJARITO LODGE NO 66 AF&AM: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$180k · 4 repeat orgs$225k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
13

Total granted

$180k
$182k

Still filing today

75%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    Masonic Service Association
    2× · 2022–2023 · $84k · revenue +42%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LINCOLN COUNTY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $55k · revenue +253%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2018–2019 · $23k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $87k
  • SL
    SANDOVAL LODGE NO 76 AF&AM
    one grant, 2024 · $12k
  • BL
    BENT LODGE NO 42 AF&AM
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $87,004 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $22,929 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMONTEZUMA LODGE NO 1 AF & AM INC: $18,500 · OtherMONTEZUMA LODGE NO 1 AF & AM INCSANDOVAL LODGE NO 76 AF&AM: $12,497 · OtherVALLEY OF LAS CRUCES LEARNING CENTE: $12,190 · OtherPORTALES LODGE NO 26: $10,500 · OtherBENT LODGE NO 42 AF&AM: $10,032 · OtherALBUQUERQUE LODGE NO 60 AF&AM: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $9,332 · OtherGRAND LODGE OF NEW MEXICO: $9,100 · Other+10 more: $64,588 · Other+10 moreMasonic Service Association: $83,520 · Community ImprovementMasonic Service Associa…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LINCOLN COUNTY: $55,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUND…
Other$266,672Community Improvement$83,520Philanthropy$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMasonic Service Association: $83,520 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LINCOLN COUNTY: $55,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMONTEZUMA LODGE NO 1 AF & AM INC: $18,500 over 2y, 8.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Masonic Service Association ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LINCOLN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds MONTEZUMA LODGE NO 1 AF & AM INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Masonic Charity Foundation of New Mexico Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Masonic Charity Foundation of New Mexico Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Masonic Charity Foundation of New Mexico Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Masonic Charity Foundation of New Mexico Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Masonic Charity Foundation of New Mexico’s filings →

    More from the funding graph