Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Maryland · Public charity

Maryland Delaware and District of Columbia Elks Assoc

The Association of the B.P.O.E. of Elks Lodges in the State of MD, DE and DC was formed to unite all Elks in closer bonds of fraternity to promote good fellowship among Lodges, to protect and promote the interests of this Order and to bear true allegiance to the Constitution and laws of the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks

$166k
Granted FY2023
1
Itemized grants FY2023
1
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$80k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$79,784
Largest grant, FY2023
$79,784
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$2.1M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
William J Jernick Memorial Fund Inc$79,784152%

Compare Maryland Delaware and District of Columbia Elks Assoc with peer funders

About Maryland Delaware and District of Columbia Elks Assoc

How much does Maryland Delaware and District of Columbia Elks Assoc give?
Maryland Delaware and District of Columbia Elks Assoc reported 1 itemized grants totaling $79,784, out of $166,284 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing.
What does Maryland Delaware and District of Columbia Elks Assoc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2023, its largest causes are Philanthropy (100%).
Who are Maryland Delaware and District of Columbia Elks Assoc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2023: William J Jernick Memorial Fund Inc ($80k).
Where is Maryland Delaware and District of Columbia Elks Assoc based?
Maryland Delaware and District of Columbia Elks Assoc is based in MD.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $62k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Maryland Delaware and District of Columbia Elks Assoc’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home