Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary E Babcock Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$138k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$508kEducation$350kArts & Culture$63kRecreation & Sports$48kEnvironment$40kPublic Benefit$34kCommunity Improvement$14kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
$6,889
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION$104,526
JOHNSTOWN MONROE SCHOOL DISTRICT$10,500
MARY BABCOCK LIBRARY$10,000
APPLE BLOSSOM FLOWERS LANDSCAPING$6,889
HARTFORD TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPT$2,760
THE ELECTRICAL TRADES CENTER$1,500
GA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BURSAR OFFICE$1,500
NORTHRIDGE LOCAL SCHOOLS$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 8% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $2k → 13%GA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY BURSAR OFFICE: $2k → 13%HARTFORD TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPT: $3k → 10%APPLE BLOSSOM FLOWERS LANDSCAPING: $7k → 12%KESSLER SIGN COMPANY: $14k → 14%OHIO STATE UNIVERISTY: $3k → 15%MARY BABCOCK LIBRARY: $107k → 10%APPLE BLOSSOM FLOWERS LANDSCAPING: $7k → 12%OHIO STATE UNIVERISTY: $3k → 15%JOHNSTOWN MONROE SCHOOLS: $72k → 10%APPLE BLOSSOM FLOWERS LANDSCAPING: $6k → 12%JOHNSTOWN YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $25k → 10%APPLE BLOSSOM FLOWERS LANDSCAPING: $6k → 12%MARY BABCOCK LIBRARY: $20k → 10%APPLE BLOSSOM FLOWERS LANDSCAPING: $6k → 12%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 15%MONROE TOWNSHIP: $19k → 10%APPLE BLOSSOM FLOWERS LANDSCAPING: $5k → 12%FRIENDS OF CORNELL SCHOOL: $16k → 10%APPLE BLOSSOM FLOWERS LANDSCAPING: $5k → 12%MONROE TOWNSHIP TRUSTEES: $15k → 10%APPLE BLOSSOM FLOWERS LANDSCAPING: $5k → 12%JOHNSTOWN MONROE SCHOOLS: $13k → 10%APPLE BLOSSOM FLOWERS LANDSCAPING: $5k → 12%JOHNSTOWN MONROE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $11k → 10%MARY E BABCOCK LIBRARY: $10k → 10%VILLAGE OF JOHNSTOWN: $10k → 10%MARY BABCOCK LIBRARY: $10k → 10%JOHNSTOWN MONROE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $9k → 10%JOHNSTOWN MONROE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $7k → 10%JOHNSTOWN MONROE SCHOOLS: $5k → 10%JOHNSTOWN MONROE CHIOR BOOSTERS: $5k → 10%HENDREN TRUCKING: $4k → 10%NORTHRIDGE LOCAL SCHOOLS: $2k → 10%LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION: $132k → 10%LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION: $105k → 10%LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION: $102k → 10%LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION: $58k → 10%LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION: $56k → 10%LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION: $55k → 10%LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%THE WORKS: $10k → 10%THE WORKS: $10k → 10%THE WORKS: $9k → 10%THE WORKS: $9k → 10%LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION: $6k → 10%DON SPIRES: $10k → 10%JOHNSTOWN YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Mary E Babcock Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 84%.

Mary E Babcock Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$973k · 11 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +65% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
14

Total granted

$973k
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+65%

Still filing today

27%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    THE WORKS - OHIO CENTER FOR HISTORY ART & TECHNOLOGY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $37k · revenue +69%
  • JY
    JOHNSTOWN YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $35k · revenue +106%
  • OU
    Otterbein University
    2× · 2020–2023 · $3k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $19k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF CORNELL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $16k
  • MT
    MONROE TOWNSHIP TRUSTEES
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Youngstown Area Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee

To provide training to electrical apprentices in mahoning and trumbull counties, and through that training to provide skilled workers to area employers.

Employment
2
Transylvania University

Through an engagement with the liberal arts, transylvania university prepares its students for a humane and fulfilling personal and public life by cultivating independent thinking, open-mindedness, creative expression and commitment to…

Education
3
Westerville Symphony At Otterbein

The westerville symphony at otterbein university provides symphonic performances to audiences in central ohio and music education in westerville and the surrounding communities.

—
4
Defiance College

Defiance College graduates students to lead distinctive lives in their chosen professions through a spirit of service by preparing them to Know, To Understand, To Lead, and To Serve.

Education
5
Johnstown Symphony Orchestra

The mission of the johnstown symphony orchestra is to enable a broad audience in our geographic region to experience live performances of high quality classical orchestral music.

Arts & Culture
6
Johnson College

Johnson college provides real-world, hands-on learning in a caring environment and prepares graduates to enter into or advance in their careers.

Education
7
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Rensselaer educates the leaders of tomorrow for technologically based careers. We celebrate discovery and the responsible application of technology to create knowledge and global prosperity.

Education
8
University of Northwestern Ohio

The University of Northwestern Ohio's vision is to be a premier provider of high-quality education through innovative and experiential learning environments. The University strives to develop empowered graduates who think critically and…

Education
9
Lycoming College

The mission of lycoming college is to provide a distinguished baccalaureate education in the liberal arts and sciences within a coeducational, supportive, and residential setting.

Education
10
Johnstown Historical Society
—
11
Susquehanna University

Susquehanna university educates students for productive, creative and reflective lives of achievement, leadership, and service in a diverse, dynamic and interdependent world.

Education
12
Oberlin College

Oberlin College and Conservatory educate students for lives of intellectual, musical and artistic rigor and breadth, sustained inquiry, creativity and innovation, and leadership. Oberlin aims to prepare graduates with the knowledge,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Works - Ohio Center for History Art & Technology; the most unlike its peers is Build of Lickng County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION: $563,456 · OtherLICKING COUNTY FOUNDATIONMARY E BABCOCK LIBRARY INC: $147,000 · OtherMARY E BABCOCK LIBRARY INCJOHNSTOWN MONROE SCHOOLS: $89,721 · OtherJOHNSTOWN MONROE SCHOOLSAPPLE BLOSSOM FLOWERS LANDSCAPING: $53,969 · OtherAPPLE BLOSSOM FLOWERS LANDSCAPING+20 more: $147,653 · Other+20 moreTHE WORKS - OHIO CENTER FOR HISTORY ART & TECHNOLOGY: $37,240 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,200 · Arts & CultureJOHNSTOWN YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $35,000 · Recreation & SportsOtterbein University: $3,000 · Education
Other$1,001,799Arts & Culture$38,440Recreation & Sports$35,000Education$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE WORKS - OHIO CENTER FOR HISTORY ART & TECHNOLOGY: $37,240 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJOHNSTOWN YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC: $35,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetOtterbein University: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELECTRICAL TRADES CENTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRose-Hulman Institute of Technology: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWARK-GRANVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $1,200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBUILD OF LICKNG COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WORKS - OHIO CENTER FOR HISTORY ART & TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds JOHNSTOWN YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Otterbein University ↗
  • Who funds THE ELECTRICAL TRADES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds NEWARK-GRANVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds BUILD OF LICKNG COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Energy Cooperative Roundup Foundation IncOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Energy Cooperative Roundup Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary E Babcock Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary E Babcock Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mary E Babcock Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Mary E Babcock Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary E Babcock’s filings →

    More from the funding graph