Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary C Jolly Charitable Tua

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$80kEducation$40kArts & Culture$34k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$273k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$16,100
MEMORIAL & LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF$16,100
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$16,100
WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON$1,000
RHODE ISLAND COLLEGE$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT$1,000
FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY$750
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY$500
COLLEGE OF OUR LADY OF THE ELMS$500
UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $906 → 15%WHEATON COLLEGE: $1k → 11%WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $1k → 16%COLLEGE OF OUR LADY OF THE ELMS: $500 → 17%San Diego State University: $591 → 11%ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%American Cancer Society Inc: $5k → 16%Florida Gulf Coast University: $591 → 11%LYNN UNIVERSITY: $824 → 11%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $16k → 12%Florida State University: $591 → 19%FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY: $750 → 9%University of Hartford: $591 → 11%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON: $1k → 12%MEMORIAL & LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF: $16k → 7%COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF RHODE ISLAND: $536 → 7%Bryant University: $500 → 14%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $1k → 10%LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $500 → 19%University of New Hampshire: $2k → 9%PLYMOUTH STATE UNIVERSITY: $822 → 10%University of Massachusetts Dartmouth: $906 → 11%American Cancer Society Inc: $5k → 16%University of Hartford: $500 → 11%Memorial & Library Association of: $5k → 7%Rhode Island College: $2k → 14%University of New Hampshire: $591 → 9%American Cancer Society Inc: $4k → 16%University of Rhode Island: $1k → 7%RHODE ISLAND COLLEGE: $1k → 14%American Cancer Society Inc: $4k → 16%Memorial & Library Assoc of Westerly: $5k → 7%Rhode Island College: $591 → 14%American Cancer Society Inc: $2k → 16%University of Rhode Island: $1k → 7%American Cancer Society Inc: $2k → 16%Memorial & Library Association of: $4k → 7%American Cancer Society Inc: $2k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $1k → 7%Memorial & Library Association of: $4k → 7%University of Rhode Island: $536 → 7%Memorial & Library Association of: $2k → 7%University of Rhode Island: $536 → 7%Memorial & Library Association of: $2k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND: $500 → 7%Memorial & Library Assoc of Westerly: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
NY
MA
CT
RI
CA
MD
AZ
NC
OK
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$116k · 8 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
24

Total granted

$116k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+19%

Still filing today

38%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    8× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +33%
  • MA
    MEMORIAL AND LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF WESTERLY
    6× · 2018–2025 · $33k · revenue -51%
  • AC
    American Cancer Society Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $24k

Funded once

  • SB
    ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +23%
  • WHEATON COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +14%
  • UO
    University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
    one grant, 2021 · $906
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
7
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
8
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
9
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
10
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
11
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Cancer Society Inc: $24,108 · OtherAmerican Cancer Society IncMemorial & Library Association of: $7,014 · OtherMemorial & Library Association ofUniversity of Rhode Island: $4,755 · OtherUniversity of Rhode IslandRhode Island College: $3,091 · OtherUniversity of New Hampshire: $2,591 · Other+24 more: $16,829 · Other+24 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $40,208 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $16,100 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCMEMORIAL AND LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF WESTERLY: $33,194 · EducationMEMORIAL AND LIBRARY ASSOCIA…+7 more: $5,665 · Education+7 more
Other$58,388Health$56,308Education$38,859

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $40,208 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL AND LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF WESTERLY: $33,194 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $16,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY: $1,173 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD: $1,091 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHEATON COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYNN UNIVERSITY INC: $824 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFairfield University: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF OUR LADY OF THE ELMS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRYANT UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL AND LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF WESTERLY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD ↗
  • Who funds WHEATON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WENTWORTH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds LYNN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Fairfield University ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF OUR LADY OF THE ELMS ↗
  • Who funds BRYANT UNIVERSITY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary C Jolly Charitable Tua funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary C Jolly Charitable Tua. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc: 2% of income from government
  • University of Hartford: 1% of income from government
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
  • Wheaton College: 0% of income from government
  • Lynn University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary C Jolly Charitable Tua’s filings →

More from the funding graph