Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marshall Legacy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$16MHousing & Shelter$9.0MHealth$6.5MHuman Services$1.5MPublic Safety & Disaster$210kInternational$200kCivil Rights$190kArts & Culture$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k7 grants · $600k
  • $250k+4 grants · $5.0M
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Tulane University$1,500,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN$1,500,000
Mary M Dower Benevolent Corporation$1,000,000
Tulane University$1,000,000
American Red Cross$100,000
DALLAS CASA$100,000
American Red Cross$100,000
KERA$100,000
COMMITTEE TO REDUCE INFECTION DEATH$100,000
Genesis Women's Shelter$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%American Red Cross: $100k → 14%American Red Cross: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Marshall Legacy Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Marshall Legacy Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 12 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$23M
$11M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+18%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHousing & ShelterCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
    2× · 2024–2025 · $5.0M · revenue +8%
  • TC
    THE COMMITTEE TO REDUCE INFECTION DEATHS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $400k · revenue +64% · 51% of their budget
  • DC
    DALLAS CASA
    3× · 2021–2025 · $190k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • TK
    The Kinkaid School Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $10M · revenue +18%
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $850k · revenue +44%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
2
Texas Medical Association

The texas medical association (tma), the nation's largest and one of the oldest state medical societies, represents over 59,000 physicians and medical students dedicated to enhancing the health of all texans. in collaboration with 110…

—
3
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
4
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
5
Texas Health Resources

Through its affiliates, thr operates an integrated healthcare system with services and facilities throughout north central texas to improve the health of the people in the communities they serve.

Health
6
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
7
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
8
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
9
Texas a&M Foundation

The texas a&m foundation builds a brighter future for texas a&m university, one relationship at a time, by uniting generosity and vision to raise support and manage endowed gifts.

Education
10
TMC3 Development Corporation
Health
11
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
12
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Texas Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mary M Dower Benevolent Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Kinkaid School Inc: $10,000,000 · EducationThe Kinkaid School IncTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $5,000,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUNDUTMD ANDERSON: $6,014,320 · OtherUTMD ANDERSONGENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER: $5,260,000 · OtherGENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTERMary M Dower Benevolent Corporation: $1,475,000 · OtherMary M Dower Benevolent CorporationTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $850,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC+5 more: $430,898 · OtherEMILY'S PLACE INC: $3,750,000 · Housing & ShelterEMILY'S PLAC…THE COMMITTEE TO REDUCE INFECTION DEATHS INC: $400,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $30,000 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200,000 · Human ServicesDALLAS CASA: $190,000 · Civil RightsNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $150,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$15,000,000Other$14,030,218Housing & Shelter$3,750,000Health$430,000Human Services$200,000Civil Rights$190,000Arts & Culture$150,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Kinkaid School Inc: $10,000,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $5,000,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEMILY'S PLACE INC: $3,750,000 over 4y, 72% of budgetMary M Dower Benevolent Corporation: $1,475,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $850,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE COMMITTEE TO REDUCE INFECTION DEATHS INC: $400,000 over 4y, 51% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS CASA: $190,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWOOD WOMAN'S CLUB CHARITABLE FUND: $15,898 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTurner Syndrome Society of the U S: $15,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marshall Legacy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marshall Legacy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Marshall Legacy Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Marshall Legacy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marshall Legacy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph