Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marshall Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$119k
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$125kEducation$74kHuman Services$43kHealth$38kReligion$22kAnimals$15kFood & Nutrition$10kYouth Development$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k29 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $88k
$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$30,000
PRESBYTERIAN MANOR FOUNDATION$18,000
THE GARAGE$17,000
SPENCER MUSEUM OF ART$12,000
SALINA SYMPHONY$11,000
KU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE - SALINA CAMPUS$4,000
PRAIRIE MUSEUM OF ART AND HISTORY$3,500
ROLLING HILLS WILDLIFE PARK$3,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,500
ST ANN'S CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,000
JUST FOOD OF DOUGLAS COUNTY INC$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,900
SMOKY HILL MUSEUM$1,700
SALINA RESCUE MISSION INC$1,000
EISENHOWER FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $400 → 11%LARAMIE SOUP KITCHEN: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$386k · 37 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
17

Total granted

$386k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+27%

Still filing today

43%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KW
    KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $69k · revenue +43%
  • SS
    SALINA SYMPHONY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $46k · revenue +69%
  • OI
    OCCK INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $14k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • LS
    LARAMIE SOUP KITCHENgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +801%
  • LI
    LARAMIE INTERFAITH
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -3%
  • U3
    USD 339
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Salina Regional Health Center Inc

To provide quality health care services in a healing and spiritual environment

Health
2
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
3
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
4
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

—
5
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition
6
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
7
Hospice of Salina Inc

Serve persons with terminal illness and their families, using multidisciplinary team of medical and social service professionals, and provide community outreach by offering grief support groups and end of life education.

Human Services
8
San Luis Valley Health Foundation

Acquire and manage assets in support of lutheran hospital association of the san luis valley.

Philanthropy
9
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
10
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
11
Labette County Medical Center

We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.

Health
12
Southeast Kansas Community Action P

Addressing the causes and effects of poverty by uniting staff, individuals, families, and community partners to provide quality, comprehensive services through compassionate, respectful relationships.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Salina Health Education Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Laramie Soup Kitchen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
20/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SPENCER MUSEUM OF ART: $66,000 · OtherSPENCER MUSEUM OF ARTSALINA SYMPHONY INC: $46,000 · OtherSALINA SYMPHONY INCTHE GARAGE: $38,500 · OtherTHE GARAGEPRESBYTERIAN MANOR FOUNDATION: $24,000 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN MANOR FOUNDATIONKU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE - SALINA CAMPUS: $20,500 · OtherKU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE - SALINA CAMPUSROLLING HILLS WILDLIFE PARK: $13,500 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $12,500 · Other+35 more: $75,475 · Other+35 moreKANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $69,000 · EducationKANSAS WESLEYAN UNIV…SALINA HEALTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Education+2 more: $1,000 · EducationOCCK INC: $14,000 · Health+1 more: $450 · HealthSALINA RESCUE MISSION INC: $3,400 · Housing & ShelterASHBY HOUSE LTD: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterDOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL KANSAS INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesLARAMIE SOUP KITCHEN: $1,000 · Human ServicesHospice of the Valley: $400 · Human ServicesGreater Salina Community Foundation: $3,500 · PhilanthropySALINA ARTS AND HUMANITIES FOUNDATION: $1,700 · Arts & CultureSALINA ART CENTER INC: $400 · Arts & Culture
Other$296,475Education$72,500Health$14,450Housing & Shelter$5,900Human Services$3,900Philanthropy$3,500Arts & Culture$2,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $69,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSALINA SYMPHONY INC: $46,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetOCCK INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Eisenhower Foundation: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJUST FOOD OF DOUGLAS COUNTY KS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGreater Salina Community Foundation: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSALINA RESCUE MISSION INC: $3,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSALINA EMERGENCY AIDFOOD BANK INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL KANSAS INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD ADVOCACY AND PARENTING SERVICE INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSALINA HEALTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASHBY HOUSE LTD: $2,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBoy Scouts of America Council 192 Coronado Area: $2,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSALINA ARTS AND HUMANITIES FOUNDATION: $1,700 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLARAMIE SOUP KITCHEN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSALINA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLARAMIE INTERFAITH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGENEVA COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of the Valley: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSALINA ART CENTER INC: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Land Institute: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KANSAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SALINA SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds OCCK INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Eisenhower Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JUST FOOD OF DOUGLAS COUNTY KS INC ↗
  • Who funds Greater Salina Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SALINA RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds SALINA EMERGENCY AIDFOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL KANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCACY AND PARENTING SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds SALINA HEALTH EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASHBY HOUSE LTD ↗
  • Who funds Boy Scouts of America Council 192 Coronado Area ↗
  • Who funds SALINA ARTS AND HUMANITIES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LARAMIE SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds SALINA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LARAMIE INTERFAITH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Salina Community FoundationKS33.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Salina Community Foundation · Smoot Charitable Foundation · Earl Bane Foundation · McCune & Middlekauff Foundation · Verla Nesbitt Joscelyn Foundation · Salina Regional Health Foundation · Mike Berkley Family Foundation Inc · Mildred and Rolland Middlekauff Foundation · Morrison Foundation Trust · Anderson Family Foundation · Milton I and Frances L Stiefel Foundation · Horejsi Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marshall Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marshall Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marshall Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph