Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marsan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$86k
Granted FY2022
10
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

59% of Marsan Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Educational Endowment Fund Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’17
1
’18
1
’19
1
’20
2
’21
1
’22
0
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0165% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$589kYouth Development$12kEducation$5kInternational$1kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2022 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $67,300, the rows itemized in this filing. The $85,680 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $18,380 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k9 grants · $17k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Education Endowment Fund$50,000
Nesivos$6,000
RJJ School$4,000
A.F. Yeshiva Amala Shel Torah$2,000
AF of Ohr Hatalmud$1,800
Vromantonu$1,000
Yeshiva Knessyet Bais Aaron$1,000
Education Opp Fund$600
PEF Israel Endowment Funds$500
Or Yechiel Meir Waldner$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CONGREGATION MESIFTA OHR HATALMUD: $175k → 14%VARIOUS - DETAIL ATTACHED: $143k → 11%CONGREGATION MESIFTA OHR HATALMUD: $150k → 14%VARIOUS - DETAIL ATTACHED: $93k → 11%CONGREGATION MESIFTA OHR HATALMUD: $120k → 14%SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE: $44k → 11%CONGREGATION MESIFTA OHR HATALMUD: $88k → 14%VARIOUS - DETAIL ATTACHED: $39k → 11%VARIOUS - DETAIL ATTACHED: $36k → 11%SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE: $21k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$855k · 3 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +109% since the first grant, against -28% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

$855k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
-28%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Youth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CONGREGATION MESIFTA OHR HATALMUD
    4× · 2017–2020 · $533k
  • VD
    VARIOUS - DETAIL ATTACHED
    4× · 2017–2020 · $311k
  • NI
    NESIVOS INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $12k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • GA
    Gur Aryeh Institute
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • SR
    SHUVU RETURN INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
2/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION MESIFTA OHR HATALMUD: $532,500 · OtherCONGREGATION MESIFTA OHR HATALMUDVARIOUS - DETAIL ATTACHED: $310,580 · OtherVARIOUS - DETAIL ATTACHED+8 more: $11,800 · OtherEDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $50,000 · EducationNESIVOS INC: $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $1,100 · PhilanthropySHUVU RETURN INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$854,880Education$50,000Youth Development$12,000Philanthropy$2,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetNESIVOS INC: $12,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHUVU RETURN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NESIVOS INC ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHUVU RETURN INC ↗

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $21k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marsan’s filings →

More from the funding graph