Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mark and Virginie Cohen Family Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2020
13
Grants FY2020
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Religion$184kInternational$43kEducation$41kScience & Tech$12kHealth$2kPhilanthropy$1kArts & Culture$200Other$0
02FY2020 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,800
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish Heritage Programs$5,401
Individual grant recipient$2,800
SEPHACADEMY$2,600
STAND WITH US$1,800
WIZO$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,800
HEBREW ACADEMY OF MIAMI$1,800
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR$1,690
Individual grant recipient$1,470
CHARIDY$1,101
CHABAD$497
UJA FEDERATION$180
THE CELL THEATRE$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LUNG CANCER RESEARCH: $2k → 8%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENN: $15k → 22%STAND WITH US: $2k → 14%ONE ISRAEL FUND: $5k → 6%YAD ELIEZER: $25k → 20%GIFT OF LIFE BONE MARROW: $2k → 11%CHARIDY: $1k → 13%SEPHACADEMY: $3k → 15%Yeshiva Bais Matityahu: $5k → 13%Congregation BIAV: $18k → 5%LUNG CANCER RESEARCH: $2k → 8%TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENN: $15k → 22%STAND WITH US: $2k → 14%UJA FEDERATION: $540 → 6%YAD ELIEZER: $13k → 20%GIFT OF LIFE BONE MARROW: $600 → 11%HEBREW ACADEMY OF MIAMI: $2k → 15%LUNG CANCER RESEARCH: $2k → 8%Jewish Heritage Programs: $5k → 22%GATEWAYS: $25k → 17%KOLEL BEIS YECHIEL: $5k → 20%Jewish Heritage Programs: $4k → 22%GATEWAYS: $10k → 17%KOLEL BEIS YECHIEL: $5k → 20%Jewish Heritage Programs: $2k → 22%SINAI TEMPLE: $5k → 6%FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCE: $10k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR: $15k → 20%Jewish Heritage Programs: $726 → 22%CENTRAL FUND: $5k → 17%BONEI OLAM ORG: $5k → 20%FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCE: $1k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR: $2k → 20%WIZO: $2k → 17%BONEI OLAM ORG: $1k → 20%GIFTS UNDER 1000: $5k → 17%GIFTS UNDER 1000: $5k → 17%GIFTS UNDER 1000: $2k → 17%CONGREGATION KEHILATH: $17k → 17%CONGREGATION KEHILATH: $6k → 17%CONGREGATION KEHILATH: $6k → 17%CONGREGATION KEHILATH: $3k → 17%LUBAVITCH: $4k → 17%THE RAMAZ SCHOOL: $2k → 17%CHABAD: $5k → 17%CHABAD: $1k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL OHR: $20k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MIGDAL OHR: $540 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$218k · 17 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2020, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
6

Total granted

$218k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+110%

Still filing today

35%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
InternationalYouth DevelopmentReligionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    American Friends of Migdal OHR
    2× · 2017–2018 · $21k · revenue +102%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $17k · revenue +72%
  • JH
    Jewish Heritage Programs
    4× · 2017–2020 · $12k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $18k
  • ST
    SINAI TEMPLE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Sherit Isroel
5
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
6
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
7
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Dorot Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Jewish Year Abroad

To provide an education based program in israel for college age jewish young adults that will instill students with a sense of purpose, commitment & pride about

International
10
Connect Israel

Connect israel is a life-long program that aims to strengthen the gap between american jews and israelis through business, creative teamwork, and developing personal relationships.

International
11
The Steinhardt Foundation for Jewish Life Inc
Religion
12
Bronfman Youth Fellowships to Israel in Inc
Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Israel Fund Ltd and the most unlike its peers is Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YAD ELIEZER — $38,200 · OtherYAD ELIEZERGATEWAYS — $35,000 · OtherGATEWAYSIndividual grant recipient — $32,291 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGIFTS UNDER 1000 — $11,750 · OtherGIFTS UNDER 1000Individual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $6,830 · OtherCHABAD — $6,637 · Other+12 more — $36,501 · Other+12 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC — $16,690 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIE…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $11,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF TH…ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD — $5,000 · InternationalONE ISRAEL FU…ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $3,600 · InternationalISRAEL EMERGE…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $30,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF…American Friends of Migdal OHR — $20,540 · Youth DevelopmentJewish Heritage Programs — $12,027 · ReligionUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $1,220 · Philanthropy
Other$195,209International$36,290Education$30,000Youth Development$20,540Religion$12,027Philanthropy$1,220

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR — $20,540 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC — $16,690 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Heritage Programs — $12,027 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONE ISRAEL FUND LTD — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $1,220 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds American Friends of Migdal OHR
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC
  • Who funds Jewish Heritage Programs
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mark and Virginie Cohen Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2021) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph