Skip to content
Mark & Marilyn Talve Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Mark & Marilyn Talve Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Arts & Culture$41kPhilanthropy$19kHealth$8kHuman Services$7kReligion$7kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$59k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS CHARITIES$4,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%URBAN GOLF ACADEMY: $5k → 7%PUNARNAVA HEALING COMMUNIT: $2k → 8%AVI LEVINE RELIGIOUS SCHOOL: $500 → 11%VARIOUS CHARITIES: $9k → 6%METROPOLITAL OPERA: $10k → 17%ONE STORY: $10k → 20%CENTRAL REFORM TEMPLE: $5k → 21%RALSTON HOUSE: $2k → 7%RRP FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%VARIOUS CHARITIES: $5k → 6%METROPOLITAL OPERA: $10k → 17%ONE STORY: $5k → 20%CENTRAL REFORM TEMPLE: $1k → 21%VARIOUS CHARITIES: $3k → 6%MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES: $5k → 17%VARIOUS CHARITIES: $2k → 6%METROPOLITAL OPERA: $6k → 17%ALZHEIMERS ASSOC: $5k → 6%ALZHEIMERS ASSOC: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$72k · 5 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +52% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$72k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+52%

Still filing today

20%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22
EducationCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    METROPOLITAL OPERA
    3× · 2017–2019 · $26k
  • VC
    VARIOUS CHARITIES
    4× · 2018–2022 · $19k
  • OS
    ONE STORY INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $15k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • UG
    URBAN GOLF ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • MC
    MISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • RH
    Ralston Housegraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
3/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

METROPOLITAL OPERA: $25,500 · OtherMETROPOLITAL OPERAVARIOUS CHARITIES: $18,815 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITIESALZHEIMERS ASSOC: $6,500 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCCENTRAL REFORM TEMPLE: $6,000 · OtherCENTRAL REFORM TEMPLEURBAN GOLF ACADEMY: $5,000 · OtherURBAN GOLF ACADEMYMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES: $4,568 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS CHARITIES+2 more: $2,000 · OtherONE STORY INC: $15,000 · EducationONE STORY INCRalston House: $2,000 · Community ImprovementPUNARNAVA HEALING COMMUNITY INC: $1,500 · International
Other$68,383Education$15,000Community Improvement$2,000International$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetONE STORY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetRalston House: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPUNARNAVA HEALING COMMUNITY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONE STORY INC ↗
  • Who funds Ralston House ↗
  • Who funds PUNARNAVA HEALING COMMUNITY INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mark & Marilyn Talve Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mark & Marilyn Talve Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mark & Marilyn Talve’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home