Skip to content
Marion-Polk Food Share Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Marion-Polk Food Share Inc

Bringing people together to end hunger and its root causes.

$13M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$142kHealth$30k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $200, the rows itemized in this filing. The $12,998,157 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,997,957 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$200
Median grant
1
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANO-A-MANO FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SILVERTON AREA COMMUNITY AID: $2k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $3k → 14%HOAP NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES: $2k → 14%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $200 → 14%HOST SHELTER NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$154k · 22 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +146% since the first grant, against +96% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
28

Total granted

$154k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+146%
+96%

Still filing today

23%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SANTIAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    2× · 2021–2022 · $75k · revenue +217%
  • NH
    NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2k · revenue +84%
  • MA
    Mano A Mano
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2k · revenue +540%

Funded once

  • SC
    SILVER CREEK FELLOWSHIP
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4k
  • SILVERTON AREA COMMUNITY AID INCgraduated
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2k · revenue +96%
  • SW
    SALEM WEST FOURSQUARE CHURCH
    6× · 2017–2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Clackamas Service Center

Clackamas service center is an inclusive, "one-stop" community center for individuals and families seeking food relief and resources for improved health, dignity, and stability.

Human Services
2
Community Sharing Program

Provide South Lane County community members with basic needs resources, life skills, and resources toward self-sufficiency.

Human Services
3
Clatsop Community Action

Clatsop community action, inc. (cca) is an oregon nonprofit corporation whose mission is to assist low-income individuals and families meet housing, energy, food and other basic living needs in the clatsop county area of oregon. cca…

—
4
Columbia Pacific Food Bank

Columbia pacific food bank is the regional food distribution center for columbia county, oregon and local food pantry for the community of saint helens.

Food & Nutrition
5
South Corvallis Food Bank

Increase sustainable food security in South Corvallis by providing emergency food and supplies.

Food & Nutrition
6
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
7
West Seattle Food Bank

West Seattle Food Bank strengthens the community through the power of neighbors helping neighbors, working to ensure all in our community have access to the essential necessities of living.

Food & Nutrition
8
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
9
Thrive Central Oregon

To connect individuals to the housing and community resources they seek.

Human Services
10
Catholic Charities of Spokane

Catholic charities affirms the dignity of every person, partnering with parishes and the greater community to serve and advocate for those who are vulnerable, bringing stability and hope to people throughout eastern washington.

Human Services
11
Catholic Community Services of Lane County Inc

Responding to christ's message to love our neighbors as ourselves, catholic community services offers immediate help by providing food and other assistance to anyone in need and seeks to instill hope by helping lane county individuals and…

Human Services
12
Womenspace

Our mission is to protect, shelter, and empower survivors of domestic violence - offering safety, support, and resources with compassion and trauma-informed care.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency; the most unlike its peers is House of Zion Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
23/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PENTECOSTAL CHURCH OF GOD INC: $15,758 · OtherPENTECOSTAL CHURCH OF GOD INCMEHAMA COMMUNITY CHURCH JOSEPH STOREHOUSE OF HOPE: $12,610 · OtherMEHAMA COMMUNITY CHURCH JOSEPH STOREHOUSE OF HOPEIDANHA COMMUNITY CHURCH: $12,093 · OtherIDANHA COMMUNITY CHURCHMILL CITY-GATES COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER: $10,735 · OtherMILL CITY-GATES COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTERWillamette Valley Food Assistance Program: $6,589 · OtherWillamette Valley Food Assistance ProgramSILVER CREEK FELLOWSHIP: $4,175 · OtherSOUTH SALEM FRIENDS CHURCH: $3,135 · Other+38 more: $24,419 · Other+38 moreSANTIAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $75,000 · HealthSANTIAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL+1 more: $296 · HealthST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $2,830 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES INC: $2,050 · Human ServicesSILVERTON AREA COMMUNITY AID INC: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$89,514Health$75,296Human Services$6,880

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANTIAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $2,830 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES INC: $2,050 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSILVERTON AREA COMMUNITY AID INC: $2,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMano A Mano: $1,557 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDALLAS EMERGENCY FOOD CORP: $820 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDIABETES SUPPORT SERVICES: $296 over 3y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANTIAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds SILVERTON AREA COMMUNITY AID INC ↗
  • Who funds Mano A Mano ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS EMERGENCY FOOD CORP ↗
  • Who funds ELLA CURRAN COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds DIABETES SUPPORT SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Mid…Maps Community Founda…The Oregon Community …The Salem FoundationOCF Joseph E Weston P…The Ford Family Found…Mid Willamette Valley…Salem HealthWillamette Health Cou…The Collins FoundationGelco Charitable Foun…The Roundhouse Founda…
United Way of the Mid-Willamette ValleyOR42.6× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley · Maps Community Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Salem Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency · Salem Health · Willamette Health Council · The Collins Foundation · Gelco Charitable Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marion-Polk Food Share Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marion-Polk Food Share Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Ella Curran Community Food Bank: 70% of income from government
  • Northwest Human Services Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Santiam Memorial Hospital: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marion-Polk Food Share’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home