How much did MARIE C AND JOSEPH C WILSON grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of MARIE C AND JOSEPH C WILSON’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

crisiscovidtraumacare

2021

mental behavioralbehavioral healthsheltereconomicdisabilityrefugeerochester monroe

2022

expansioncarejustice

2023

traumajusticehopeyouth

2024

advocacyyouth

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k18 grants · $560k
$50k–250k8 grants · $545k

$40,000

Median grant

States reached

$22M

Total assets

Largest grants

CONNECTED COMMUNITIES$100,005
EMPIRE JUSTICE CENTER$80,005
HOPE585$80,000
COMMONGROUND HEALTH$65,000
MULTI-CRAFT APPRENTICESHIP$60,050
HOUSE OF MERCY$60,000
YWCA OF ROCHESTER & MONROE COUNTY$50,000
PERSON CENTERED HOUSING$50,000
PUBLIC POLICY & EDUCATION FUND OF$45,000
BREATHEDEEP INC$45,000
THE CHILDREN'S AGENDA$45,000
COORDINATED CARE SERVICES$40,000
CONNECTED COMMUNITIES$40,000
THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF$40,000
JUST CAUSE$35,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $967k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.9M · 25 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +127% since the first grant, against +50% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.9M

$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+127%

+50%

Still filing today

60%

27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $445k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCrime & LegalEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CONNECTED COMMUNITIES INC
4× · 2021–2024 · $260k · revenue +944%
HOUSE OF MERCY
5× · 2020–2024 · $226k · revenue +85%
TC
THE CHILDREN'S AGENDA
5× · 2020–2024 · $201k · revenue +62%

Funded once

FL
FINGER LAKES HEALTH SYSTEM AGENCY
one grant, 2021 · $110k
PI
PCHO INC
one grant, 2023 · $65k
JC
JUST CAUSE - JUSTICE FOR ALL RIGHT
one grant, 2021 · $60k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

RochesterMonroe County Homeless

The Organization is dedicated to ending homelessness in Monroe County.

Housing & Shelter

Rochester Management Inc

To provide clean, safe, well maintained, and affordable apartments and townhouses, suitable for anyone, in many locations throughout rochester, new york.

Housing & Shelter

Leadership Rochester Inc

We inspire and connect a diverse network of individuals who will provide leadership in Rochester.

Education

Casa of Rochester-Monroe County Inc

To advocate for children who have been abused and/or neglected.

Unclassified

Greater Rochester Housing

To provide financing for affordable housing projects for social services and housing agencies.

Housing & Shelter

Compeer Rochester Inc

Through supportive friendships, enhance the wellness of those with social and emotional barriers.

Health

Rochester Housing Development Fund

To finance the acquisition and rehabilitation of housing for low-income individuals.

Housing & Shelter

Family Promise Rochester

To provide safe and supportive emergency shelter, meals and assistance to homeless families in the geographic area.

Human Services

Rochester Child Care Center Inc

To provide high quality and affordable child care to working families within the community.

Human Services

St Joseph's House of Hospitality

Provide meals and shelter to indigent members of the Rochester community.

—

Community Voices Heard Inc

The Organization works to promote the social welfare of low income people living in New York City, New York State and the nation through public education, leadership development and advocacy.

Employment

Breast Cancer Coalition of Rochester Inc

To cultivate community among those touched by breast or gynecologic cancer; To empower informed decision-making through education, support and advocacy; and to advance research in our region with the goal of eradicating breast cancer.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Villa of Hope and the most unlike its peers is University of Rochester. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 25. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 14% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3%1/36

the rest of the field

286/4,357

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

35 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

33/35

Grantees still filing

27/35

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,634,823Human Services$966,805Crime & Legal$368,005Community Improvement$270,010Education$151,000Health$140,000Public Benefit$135,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Rochester Health FoundationNY63× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Rochester Health Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation · Esl Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester And · Max and Marian Farash Charitable · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc · Charles J & Burton S August Family · William & Sheila Konar Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MARIE C AND JOSEPH C WILSON funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ROCHESTER ALLIANCE OF COMMUNITIES.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 471622567 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ROCHESTER ALLIANCE OF COMMUNITIES, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 19% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Marie C and Joseph C Wilson?

Find your warmest path to Marie C and Joseph C Wilson through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MARIE C AND JOSEPH C WILSON

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

35 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Marie C and Joseph C Wilson?

More from the funding graph

MARIE C AND JOSEPH C WILSON

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

35 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Marie C and Joseph C Wilson?

More from the funding graph