Skip to content

· Public charity

Male Contraceptive Initiative

MALE CONTRACEPTIVE INITIATIVE's mission is to empower men, and couples, to fully contribute to family planning goals by providing them the resources they need for reproductive autonomy.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$8.9MScience & Tech$724kEducation$721kPhilanthropy$345k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $693,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,106,183 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $412,683 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $260k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$100,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SACYL PHARMACEUTICALS$400,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$160,000
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$100,000
ANTHER$23,500
CHICAGO UNIVERSITY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $200k → 12%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $150k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $400k → 11%Planned Parenthood North Central St: $150k → 14%VIBLIOME THERAPEUTICS INC: $175k → 10%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $120k → 8%YOURCHOICE THERAPEUTICS: $650k → 10%Revolution Contraceptives LLC: $100k → 10%NEXT LIFE SCIENCES INC: $400k → 12%ETR: $6k → 13%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $100k → 16%WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE: $620k → 17%Baylor College of Medicine: $250k → 16%Wayne State University: $75k → 21%SACYL PHARMACEUTICALS: $400k → 9%Contraceptive Accelerator Network: $750k → 8%UNC CH-Rahima Benhabbour: $150k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $75k → 14%OUTSIGHT 4 DEVELOPMENT: $127k → 13%CHICAGO UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF REPRODUCTI: $6k → 6%CONTRALINE: $100k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO: $100k → 10%Jackson Labs - Robert Braun: $150k → 11%University of Massachusetts-Amherst: $75k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $160k → 11%Venn Foundation: $345k → 14%VIBLIOME THERAPEUTICS INC: $175k → 10%YourChoice Therapeutics: $150k → 10%Weill Cornell Medical College: $291k → 17%Baylor College-Medicine-S Palmer: $150k → 16%SACYL PHARMACEUTICALS: $145k → 9%CONTRACEPTIVE ACCELERATOR NETWORK: $258k → 8%EPPIN PHARMA INC: $616k → 13%Emory University-Steve LHernault: $75k → 14%Outsight 4 Development: $100k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $100k → 11%Vibliome Therapeutics: $150k → 10%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $75k → 16%Eppin Pharma Inc: $550k → 13%Emory University: $75k → 14%ANTHER: $24k → 10%Baylor College of Medicine: $75k → 16%Eppin Pharma Inc: $300k → 13%Baylor College-Medicine-TGarcia: $65k → 16%Eppin Pharma Inc: $150k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
CT
CA
VA
NC
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $374k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions, $368k to organizations and $6k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$261k · 70% · 1 grant · 3 people

Stated purpose: RESEARCH · GRANTS LESS THAN 5,000

East Asia and the Pacific$109k · 29% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: RESEARCH

Middle East and North Africa$3k · 1% · 5 people

Stated purpose: GRANTS LESS THAN 5,000

South America$2k · 0% · 2 people

Stated purpose: GRANTS LESS THAN 5,000

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Male Contraceptive Initiative’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Male Contraceptive Initiativelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.2M · 11 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
13

Total granted

$8.2M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+7%

Still filing today

18%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $134k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    EPPIN PHARMA INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1.6M
  • C
    Contraline
    2× · 2018–2021 · $1.1M
  • CA
    Contraceptive Accelerator Network
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1.0M

Funded once

  • NL
    NEXT LIFE SCIENCES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $400k
  • CC
    CAPE COD COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
4
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
5
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
6
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
7
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
8
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
9
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
10
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
11
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Boston University; the most unlike its peers is Venn Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EPPIN PHARMA INC: $1,616,000 · OtherEPPIN PHARMA INCContraline: $1,100,000 · OtherContralineContraceptive Accelerator Network: $1,007,800 · OtherContraceptive Accelerator NetworkWeill Medical College of Cornell Univers: $910,875 · OtherWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversYOURCHOICE THERAPEUTICS: $800,000 · OtherYOURCHOICE THERAPEUTICSUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $660,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTASACYL PHARMACEUTICALS: $545,399 · OtherSACYL PHARMACEUTICALSVIBLIOME THERAPEUTICS INC: $500,000 · OtherVIBLIOME THERAPEUTICS INCNEXT LIFE SCIENCES INC: $400,000 · Other+10 more: $1,163,850 · Other+10 moreBaylor College of Medicine: $550,000 · EducationBaylor College…Emory University: $289,894 · EducationEmory Universi…Yale University: $270,000 · EducationYale Universit…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $120,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF T…Cornell University: $100,000 · EducationCornell Univer…+2 more: $16,000 · EducationVENN FOUNDATION: $345,000 · PhilanthropyPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES: $150,000 · HealthTHE JACKSON LABORATORY: $150,000 · Health+1 more: $6,000 · Health
Other$8,703,924Education$1,345,894Philanthropy$345,000Health$306,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $550,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVENN FOUNDATION: $345,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetEmory University: $289,894 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $270,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES: $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE JACKSON LABORATORY: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $120,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF REPRODUCTION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEDUCATION TRAINING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds VENN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES ↗
  • Who funds THE JACKSON LABORATORY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF REPRODUCTION INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION TRAINING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Male Contraceptive Initiative funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Male Contraceptive Initiative. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Male Contraceptive Initiative’s filings →

More from the funding graph