Skip to content

· Private foundation

Malcolm Stack Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
0174% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$243kHealth$70kArts & Culture$8kCrime & Legal$7kEnvironment$2kFood & Nutrition$500Recreation & Sports$500Public Safety & Disaster$200Other$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $28k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UW FOUNDATION$27,500
Individual grant recipient$6,350
Individual grant recipient$5,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$5,000
MADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE$2,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WI$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$2,500
AMERICAN PLAYERS THEATER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $3k → 11%LORAS COLLEGE: $2k → 11%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%DRIFTLESS LAND CONSERVANCY: $5k → 8%UW STEVENS POINT: $2k → 10%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN: $3k → 10%UW OSHKOSH: $2k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF LA CROSSE: $3k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-PLATTEVILLE: $2k → 13%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WI: $3k → 17%EVANS SCHOLARS: $6k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $2k → 11%DRIFTLESS LAND CONSERVANCY: $5k → 8%VILLAGE OF RIDGEWAY: $4k → 9%EVANS SCHOLARS: $6k → 14%DRIFTLESS LAND CONSERVANCY: $5k → 8%VILLAGE OF RIDGEWAY - COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $5k → 10%EVANS SCHOLARS: $29k → 14%DRIFTLESS LAND CONSERVANCY: $5k → 8%VILLAGE OF RIDGEWAY - COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 9%MADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $3k → 10%EVANS SCHOLARS: $6k → 14%DRIFTLESS LAND CONSERVANCY: $5k → 8%VILLAGE OF RIDGEWAY - COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 9%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $3k → 10%EVANS SCHOLARS: $4k → 14%DRIFTLESS LAND CONSERVANCY: $5k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $3k → 10%EVANS SCHOLARS: $5k → 14%DRIFTLESS LAND CONSERVANCY: $3k → 8%UW FOUNDATION: $52k → 10%EVANS SCHOLARS: $4k → 14%UW FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%EVANS SCHOLARS: $5k → 14%UW FOUNDATION: $28k → 10%UW FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%UW FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%UW FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $5k → 10%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $5k → 10%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $5k → 10%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $5k → 10%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $5k → 10%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $5k → 10%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $5k → 10%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $5k → 10%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
IA
CO
NE
MO
MD
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$412k · 16 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
19

Total granted

$412k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+13%

Still filing today

25%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $206k · revenue +21%
  • DP
    DAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +68%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC
    2× · 2017–2023 · $4k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF LA CROSSE
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
2
University of Wisconsin - Green Bay Foundation Inc

The uw-green bay foundation furthers the mission of uw-green bay, a public university, by developing and increasing opportunities for students primarily in the areas other than those in which the state of wisconsin ordinarily makes…

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
6
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
7
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
8
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
9
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
10
Mathematics Institute of Wisconsin Co Kathryn Leverenz
Education
11
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
12
Lindenwood Education System

Real experience. real success.enhancing lives through quality education and professional preparatory experiences. see schedule o.values:we put our students first. we have an unwavering commitment to providing the highest quality education,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Madison Nordic Ski Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $66,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $45,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $32,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $8,100 · OtherDAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Other+21 more: $51,500 · Other+21 moreUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $206,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION+4 more: $8,500 · EducationPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $4,000 · HealthAmerican Players Theatre of Wisconsin Inc: $1,000 · Arts & CultureMADISON NORDIC SKI CLUB: $500 · Recreation & SportsRIDGEWAY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $200 · Public Safety & DisasterNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $100 · Environment
Other$221,100Education$214,500Health$4,000Arts & Culture$1,000Recreation & Sports$500Public Safety & Disaster$200Environment$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $206,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLORAS COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVITERBO UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Players Theatre of Wisconsin Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON NORDIC SKI CLUB: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS PHINNEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds EDGEWOOD UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LORAS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VITERBO UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds American Players Theatre of Wisconsin Inc ↗
  • Who funds MADISON NORDIC SKI CLUB ↗
  • Who funds RIDGEWAY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Malcolm Stack Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Malcolm Stack Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Malcolm Stack Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Malcolm Stack Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Malcolm Stack’s filings →

    More from the funding graph