Skip to content
Malamut Auto Museum & Holdings Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Malamut Auto Museum & Holdings Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$19kPhilanthropy$14kMembership Benefit$8kAnimals$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kInternational$1kHealth$1kHousing & Shelter$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sherwood Country Club Charitable Fo$10,875
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
PEBBLE BEACH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
San Marino Motor Classic$1,500
NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION$800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 40% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Sherwood Country Club Charitable Fo: $11k → 10%CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $800 → 10%PEBBLE BEACH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%San Marino Motor Classic: $2k → 14%ASPCA: $5k → 17%WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN: $5k → 14%300SL FOUNDATION: $2k → 9%Sherwood Country Club Charitable Fo: $5k → 10%NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%PEBBLE BEACH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3k → 12%San Marino Motor Classic: $500 → 14%SHERWOOD COUNTRY CLUB CHARITABLE FO: $3k → 10%ROCKIN RESCUE: $1k → 14%PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $200 → 14%THE HOPE HOUSE FOR WOMEN: $500 → 14%SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATI: $1k → 14%PETERSEN AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM: $300 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$32k · 4 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$32k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+5%

Still filing today

75%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’24’25
PhilanthropyInternationalEducationArts & CultureMembership BenefitHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PB
    Pebble Beach Company Foundation
    3× · 2018–2025 · $10k · revenue +59%
  • SM
    SAN MARINO MOTOR CLASSIC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +51%
  • NY
    NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • C1
    CHP 11-99 FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +36%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • 3F
    300SL Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seal Cove Auto Museum
—
2
Klairmont Kollections Automotive Museum
Arts & Culture
3
West Coast Stock Car Hall of Fame
Arts & Culture
4
San Pedro Peninsula Cancer Guild

Raise funds for usc/norris comprehensive cancer center.

Philanthropy
5
Barber Vintage Motorsports Museum
Arts & Culture
6
Marin Sonoma Concours D'elegance Organization

To advance the interest and promote the education of the community about automotive culture and automotive history through events celebrating the automobile. this corporation is created for the benefit of local charities that serve the…

Philanthropy
7
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
8
Museum of American Speed
—
9
Vintage Hollywood Foundation

To raise money to support charities working to promote the health and well-being of southern california's diverse community

Philanthropy
10
Santa Cruz Island Foundation
Community Improvement
11
Car Dealers Care Foundation
Education
12
Montecito Motor Classic

The family-oriented show offers something for people of all interests, including awards, interactive displays, and priceless automobiles, all to benefit local charitable organizations. Giving back to the community is the principal…

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation; the most unlike its peers is 300SL Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Sherwood Country Club Charitable Fo: $18,875 · OtherSherwood Country Club Charitable FoIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · Other+2 more: $500 · OtherPebble Beach Company Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyPebble Beach Company Foundati…300SL Foundation: $2,000 · Philanthropy300SL FoundationSAN MARINO MOTOR CLASSIC: $2,000 · PhilanthropySAN MARINO MOTOR CLASSICCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Membership BenefitCHP 11-99 FOUND…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL…NEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $1,300 · InternationalNEPAL YOUTH F…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $5,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERIC…SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthHOPE HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$20,375Philanthropy$14,000Membership Benefit$7,500International$6,300Animals$5,000Health$1,000Housing & Shelter$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPebble Beach Company Foundation: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget300SL Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAN MARINO MOTOR CLASSIC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEPAL YOUTH FOUNDATION: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HOUSE FOR WOMEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPETERSEN AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments …
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Malamut Auto Museum & Holdings Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Malamut Auto Museum & Holdings Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Malamut Auto Museum & Holdings’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home