Skip to content

· Private foundation

Makiah's Hope Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$136k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$97k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Youth Development$172kReligion$36kHealth$9kPhilanthropy$9kAnimals$6kEducation$2kPublic Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $97k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MY 180 YOUTH PROGRAM$97,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
REST OUTREACH MINISTRY$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF KENTUCKY$5,500
WOMEN'S HEALTH CARE CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
KINDRED SOUND HOLY GROUND$1,500
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS$1,100
MODERN DAY MISSION$700
LITTLE ANGEL GOWNS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%LORD OF HOSTS CHURCH: $2k → 12%TUNNELS TO TOWERS: $2k → 11%CHRIST TABERNACLE CHURCH: $2k → 14%CHURCH INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 16%PASTRIES OF DENMARK: $2k → 11%MY 180 YOUTH PROGRAM: $97k → 21%RESTORE 7: $5k → 4%LITTLE ANGEL GOWNS: $8k → 5%TIM SHEETS MINISTRIES: $2k → 12%WORD OF LIFE: $2k → 6%OASIS CHURCH: $2k → 13%HUMANE SOCIETY OF KENTUCKY: $6k → 15%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIA: $10k → 26%REST OUTREACH MINISTRY: $10k → 11%MY 180 YOUTH PROGRAM: $45k → 21%LITTLE ANGEL GOWNS: $500 → 5%MY 180 YOUTH PROGRAM: $30k → 21%VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS: $1k → 21%KINDRED SOUND HOLY GROUND: $2k → 21%WOMEN'S HEALTH CARE CENTER: $5k → 21%LESLEY FAIRE SENTIMENTAL: $5k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NV
IN
OH
NE
MO
KY
VA
TN
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$184k · 3 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
12

Total granted

$184k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+50%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
ReligionYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • M1
    MY 180 YOUTH PROGRAM INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $172k · revenue -8% · 50% of their budget
  • LA
    Little Angel Gowns LTD
    2× · 2023–2024 · $9k · revenue -4%
  • MD
    MODERN DAY MISSION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k

Funded once

  • MT
    MIKE THOMPSON MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • RI
    Restore7 Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +131%
  • LI
    Lifeline-Connect Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MY 180 YOUTH PROGRAM INC: $172,300 · Youth DevelopmentMY 180 YOUTH PROGRAM INCIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientREST OUTREACH MINISTRY: $10,000 · OtherREST OUTREACH MINISTRYHUMANE SOCIETY OF KENTUCKY: $5,500 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF KENTUCKYWOMEN'S HEALTH CARE CENTER: $5,000 · OtherWOMEN'S HEALTH CARE CENTERMIKE THOMPSON MINISTRIES: $5,000 · OtherMIKE THOMPSON MINISTRIESIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMODERN DAY MISSION: $2,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherCHURCH INTERNATIONAL: $2,000 · OtherWORD OF LIFE INC: $2,000 · OtherLORD OF HOSTS CHURCH: $2,000 · OtherOASIS CHURCH: $2,000 · OtherCHRIST TABERNACLE CHURCH: $2,000 · Other+2 more: $2,600 · OtherLittle Angel Gowns LTD: $8,500 · PhilanthropyRestore7 Inc: $5,000 · ReligionTIM SHEETS MINISTRY: $2,000 · ReligionLifeline-Connect Inc: $4,000 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Education
Youth Development$172,300Other$59,800Philanthropy$8,500Religion$7,000Health$4,000Education$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMY 180 YOUTH PROGRAM INC: $172,300 over 3y, 50% of budgetLittle Angel Gowns LTD: $8,500 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetRestore7 Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLifeline-Connect Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTIM SHEETS MINISTRY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MY 180 YOUTH PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Little Angel Gowns LTD ↗
  • Who funds Restore7 Inc ↗
  • Who funds Lifeline-Connect Inc ↗
  • Who funds TIM SHEETS MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Spm Foundation IncNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Spm Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Makiah's Hope Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Makiah's Hope Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Makiah's Hope’s filings →

    More from the funding graph