Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mahshala Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$781k
Granted FY2024still arriving
38
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$410k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$1.6MHealth$110kFood & Nutrition$100kPhilanthropy$50kInternational$43kHuman Services$39kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kEducation$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $121k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $189k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
  • $250k+1 grant · $410k
$5,200
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAGEN DAVID YESHIVA FED ID#11-1666839$410,000
MISCELLANEOUS CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 2500$61,337
SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM INC FED ID# 47-1484178$34,200
CONGREGATION SHAARE ZION$32,550
SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC FED ID# 56-2307777$26,000
SEPHARDIC INSTITUTE FED ID# 11-27170961$18,004
CONGREGATION RODFEK ZEDEK INC FED ID#11-6037242$18,000
YESHIVA SHAARE TORAH FED ID#11-2613334$18,000
COLEL CHABAD FED ID#11-3254483$16,600
EDMUND J SAFRA SYNAGOGUE$15,680
UJA FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NY INC FED ID# 51-0172429$10,000
CONGREGATION KEREN L'TORAH FEDID#51-0188856$9,000
SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER FED ID#22-3800123$7,200
KEREN YOM-TOV FED ID#11-3501981$7,200
SAFE FOUNDATION$7,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD FED ID#22-3251871: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 31 repeat orgs$658k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
11

Total granted

$1.2M
$130k

Still filing today

16%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $528k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAFE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $39k · revenue +43%
  • PY
    Porat Yoseph Foundation
    5× · 2019–2024 · $35k · revenue +163%
  • RF
    REACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER
    3× · 2019–2021 · $11k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • MC
    MISCELLANEOUS CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 3000
    one grant, 2019 · $42k
  • SB
    SEPHARDIC BIKUR FED ID# 47-1484178
    one grant, 2020 · $26k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bais Yaakov Bnos Chayil Inc

Educational - operation of a parochial elementary school

Education
2
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
3
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
4
Maimonides Hebrew Day School

Providing a religious and secular education to students

Education
5
Congregation Beit Simcha

Jewish religious services and education

Religion
6
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
7
Maor Yeshiva High School Inc

A jewish orthodox high school

Education
8
Yeshiva Tiferes Boruch

A jewish secondary school which seeks to inculcate its students with high character and religious values to produce future religious leaders

—
9
Rinas Bais Yaakov Inc

Rinas bais yaakov, inc was established for the charitable purpose of promoting jewish education and jewish identity.

Arts & Culture
10
Congregation Tzemach Tzedek

Synogogue and school

Education
11
Mamash Foundation Usa Inc

To establish and maintain a place for religious studies and prayer in accordance with principals and customs of the Jewish orthodox religion

International
12
Birchas Yaakov Inc

Operation of an orthodox jewish educational institution, providing high school level religious education to approximately 40 students

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Kesher Organization Inc; the most unlike its peers is Magen Abraham Yeshiva Inc Congregation Bnei Ovadia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAGEN DAVID YESHIVA FED ID#11-1666839: $410,000 · OtherMAGEN DAVID YESHIVA FED ID#11-1666839MISCELLANEOUS CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 2500: $239,362 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS CONTRIBUTIONS UNDER 2500MAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH FED ID# 11-1666839: $172,150 · OtherMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH FED ID# 11-1666839SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC FED ID# 56-2307777: $100,000 · OtherSEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC FED ID# 56-2307777SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM INC FED ID# 47-1484178: $86,200 · OtherSEPHARDIC INSTITUTE FED ID# 11-27170961: $80,159 · Other+48 more: $716,754 · Other+48 moreREACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER: $11,400 · EducationBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $10,300 · EducationTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $10,800 · ReligionMAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA: $5,200 · ReligionSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $7,200 · HealthBIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$1,804,625Education$21,700Religion$16,000Health$7,200Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAFE FOUNDATION INC: $39,200 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPorat Yoseph Foundation: $35,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetREACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER: $11,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $10,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $10,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSIMHA ORGANIZATION INC: $7,200 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA: $5,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Porat Yoseph Foundation ↗
  • Who funds REACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BARKAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMHA ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAGEN ABRAHAM YESHIVA INC CONGREGATION BNEI OVADIA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · Abraham D & Annette Cohen Foundation · N'Ve Shalom Foundation Inc · The Mamiye Foundation Inc · Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc · I Chera & Sons Foundation Inc · E R G Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mahshala Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mahshala Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mahshala’s filings →

    More from the funding graph