Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mahadeva Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$216k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$882kHealth$476kArts & Culture$247kInternational$70kEducation$50kHuman Services$35kFood & Nutrition$3kPublic Benefit$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $145k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cure Alzheimer's Fund$80,000
Glaucoma Foundation$65,000
Bass Museum$25,350
Saja Group$20,000
Cambridge in America$10,000
Perez Museum$10,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Diller-Quaile School of Music$1,000
Henry Street Settlement$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Henry Street Settlement: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$855k · 10 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$855k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+96%

Still filing today

70%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $296k · revenue +286%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $180k · revenue +224%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $50k · revenue +188%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • GC
    GREENWICH COMMUNITY GARDENS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -49%
  • NF
    National Foundation for Adv of the
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
4
Bard College

Bard college seeks to provide a challenging academic program and a supportive environment that fosters a collaborative interchange of ideas in the classroom as well as ambition to achieve excellence.

Education
5
Berggruen Institute
Education
6
The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

—
7
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
8
The American Institute of Architects

Vision: drive positive change through the power of design and focused activism.mission: aia inspires and empowers architects to improve society and transform the world.

—
9
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
10
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
11
The Isamu Noguchi Foundation and Garden Museum

The mission of the isamu noguchi foundation and garden museum is to advance the understanding and appreciation of isamu noguchi's art and legacy.the isamu noguchi foundation and garden museum seeks to protect and preserve isamu noguchi's…

Arts & Culture
12
The Asia Society

The society is an international nonprofit, nonpartisan organization which connects people and institutions in asia and the world to build understanding, address challenges and maximize opportunities.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jazz At Lincoln Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Glaucoma Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $881,908 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDTHE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INC: $296,000 · HealthTHE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INCALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $180,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH F…Perez Museum: $104,125 · OtherPerez MuseumBass Museum: $76,850 · OtherBass MuseumYWCA of Greenwich: $33,850 · OtherYWCA of Greenw…+7 more: $8,745 · OtherCAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA: $50,000 · InternationalSAJA GROUP INC: $20,000 · InternationalJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $35,000 · Arts & CultureThe Ballroom Cultural Arts Foundation: $14,700 · Arts & CultureBRUCE MUSEUM INC: $14,200 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $1,800 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Public Safety & DisasterGREENWICH COMMUNITY GARDENS INC: $1,900 · Food & NutritionHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1,000 · Human Services
Community Improvement$881,908Health$476,000Other$223,570International$70,000Arts & Culture$65,700Public Safety & Disaster$50,000Food & Nutrition$1,900Human Services$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $881,908 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INC: $296,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $180,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ballroom Cultural Arts Foundation: $14,700 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBRUCE MUSEUM INC: $14,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREENWICH COMMUNITY GARDENS INC: $1,900 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE DILLER-QUAILE SCHOOL OF MUSIC INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAJA GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds The Ballroom Cultural Arts Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BRUCE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH COMMUNITY GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DILLER-QUAILE SCHOOL OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT ↗
  • Who funds THE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mahadeva Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mahadeva Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Bruce Museum Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mahadeva Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph