Skip to content
Mae Pacis & Peter Chan Wong Gonzales Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Mae Pacis & Peter Chan Wong Gonzales Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$46k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Health$26kEducation$23kHousing & Shelter$21kFood & Nutrition$20kReligion$6kHuman Services$4kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,239
Median grant
4
States reached
$101k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIVINE WORK HIGH SCHOOL DANA ALUMNI ASSN$14,517
VARIOUS FARMING INDIVIDUALS$9,975
Individual grant recipient$4,520
Individual grant recipient$3,770
Individual grant recipient$3,064
Individual grant recipient$1,895
Individual grant recipient$1,739
TAU MU SIGMA PHI$1,239
EVANGELICAL FREE CHRUCH OF AMERICA$1,030
JOSE BERNARDO PENDOZA PACIS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$920
MARIE BERNADINE JULIENNE PACIS$583
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 48% of grant dollars ($56k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 52% that went abroad ($61k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF AMERICA: $2k → 11%CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $500 → 8%DIVINE WORK HIGH SCHOOL DANA ALUMNI ASSN: $15k → 14%TAU MU SIGMA PHI USA FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%EVANGELICAL FREE CHRUCH OF AMERICA: $1k → 11%DIVINE WORD HIGH SCHOOL DANA-ILI ALUMNI: $6k → 14%TAU MU SIGMA PHI USA: $1k → 10%PARKLAND HOSPITAL SYSTEM-ACUTE RESPONSE CLINIC: $4k → 14%TAU MU SIGMA PHI: $1k → 10%PARKLAND ARC CLINIC: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 52% of all-years giving ($61k)

2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Philippines$60k · 19 grants
Japan$1k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIVINE WORK HIGH SCHOOL DANA ALUMNI ASSN: $14,517 · OtherDIVINE WORK HIGH SCHOOL DANA ALUMNI ASSNIndividual grant recipient: $13,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $11,807 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVARIOUS FARMING INDIVIDUALS: $9,975 · OtherVARIOUS FARMING INDIVIDUALSMISC AMOUNTS UNDER 500: $7,689 · OtherMISC AMOUNTS UNDER 500Individual grant recipient: $7,140 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS MEDICAL SCHOOL: $6,100 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS MEDICAL SCHOOLDIVINE WORD HIGH SCHOOL DANA-ILI ALUMNI: $5,558 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,520 · OtherTHE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF AMERICA: $4,120 · OtherPARKLAND HOSPITAL SYSTEM-ACUTE RESPONSE CLINIC: $4,097 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,770 · Other+18 more: $19,731 · Other+18 moreTAU MU SIGMA PHI USA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Education
Other$112,324Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTAU MU SIGMA PHI USA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TAU MU SIGMA PHI USA FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mae Pacis & Peter Chan Wong Gonzales Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mae Pacis & Peter Chan Wong Gonzales Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mae Pacis & Peter Chan Wong Gonzales Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home