Skip to content

· Public charity

Macomb Community College Foundation

To provide support for the mission and educational purposes of macomb community college in a charitable manner including, by way of illustration but not limitation, the promotion, sponsorship and carrying out of the educational and cultural missions of the college.

$2.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.7M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$16MScience & Tech$767kHealth$184kArts & Culture$75kCommunity Improvement$38kRecreation & Sports$25kFood & Nutrition$16k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,680,781
Median grant
1
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE$2,680,781
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Aktv8 LLC: $75k → 5%Make-Cup Concepts LLC: $25k → 8%VizBe LLC: $50k → 10%Flipsi Ltd: $3k → 13%MySwimPro Inc: $20k → 14%Recovery Park Farms Inc: $16k → 21%ALCHEMI SOLUTIONS INC: $55k → 8%MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2.9M → 10%TurtleCell LLC: $20k → 14%Sentinl Inc: $100k → 21%MUNETRIX LLC: $75k → 8%MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2.7M → 10%MYSWIMPRO INC: $5k → 14%Banza LLC: $19k → 21%ALCHEMI SOLUTIONS INC: $24k → 8%MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2.1M → 10%Stridepost: $4k → 14%City Insight LLC: $17k → 21%Munetrix LLC: $25k → 8%MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1.8M → 10%Life Magnetics Inc: $15k → 14%CITY INSIGHT LLC: $8k → 21%Alchemie Solutions Inc: $9k → 8%MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1.4M → 10%MyFAb4 Inc: $10k → 14%Evolve Lifestyle Group LLC: $5k → 21%Gap Quality Systems LLC: $8k → 8%Macomb Community College: $1.4M → 10%LIFE MAGNETICS INC: $10k → 14%Iserve: $20k → 21%MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1.3M → 10%MYFAB5 INC: $10k → 14%ISERVE: $5k → 21%MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1.3M → 10%Brio Device LLC: $100k → 14%ALERJE LLC: $25k → 21%MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1.1M → 10%Kollecto Total: $45k → 21%KTISIS LLC: $50k → 10%ENT Biotech Solutions Inc: $83k → 21%Lighthouse Electronics Protections LLC: $18k → 10%SIGN-ON CONNCET PRACTICE RETAIN: $49k → 21%Sign-On Connect Practice Retain: $25k → 21%ENT BIOTECH SOLUTIONS INC: $18k → 21%SIGN-ON CONNECT PRACTICE RETAIN: $10k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 94% of Macomb Community College Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 6%.

Macomb Community College Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 11 repeat orgs$563k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
16

Total granted

$17M
$563k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $16M
  • EB
    ENT Biotech Solutions Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k
  • ML
    MUNETRIX LLC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $100k

Funded once

  • BD
    Brio Device LLC
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • SI
    Sentinl Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • AL
    Aktv8 LLC
    one grant, 2017 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $15,996,359 · OtherMACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE+26 more: $1,104,776 · Other+26 more
Other$17,101,135

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Macomb Community College Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Macomb Community College Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Macomb Community College’s filings →

More from the funding graph