Skip to content

· Private foundation

M K King Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$139k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$93k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$96kReligion$29kPublic Safety & Disaster$16kHuman Services$10kFood & Nutrition$7kHealth$6kHousing & Shelter$5kPhilanthropy$800Other$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $93k
$2,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$53k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DONATIONS$93,100
GLOBAL CHRISTIAN RELIEF$16,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$7,000
MERCY SHIPS$5,000
POWERED TO MOVE$5,000
CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT$4,000
AMERICARES$2,500
FOOD FOR THE POOR$2,000
BOYS TOWN$1,500
CARE$1,500
WATER STREET MISSION$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$500
HONEY BROOK FIRE CO$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $2k → 12%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $4k → 26%BOYS TOWN: $2k → 12%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $4k → 26%BOYS TOWN: $2k → 12%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $4k → 26%BOYS TOWN: $500 → 12%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $4k → 26%BOYS TOWN: $400 → 12%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $1k → 26%BOYS TOWN: $100 → 12%WATER STREET MISSION: $2k → 9%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $500 → 26%WATER STREET MISSION: $1k → 9%WATER STREET MISSION: $1k → 9%WATER STREET MISSION: $800 → 9%WATER STREET MISSION: $500 → 9%WATER STREET MISSION: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
NE
KY
AR
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$315k · 20 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
4

Total granted

$315k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+10%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OD
    Open Doors With Brother Andrew Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue +42%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +39%
  • CA
    CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $17k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • PF
    PINKERTON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $800 · revenue -56%
  • MF
    Make-A-Wish Foundation of Greater PA and West Virginia Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +10%
  • PH
    PROJECT HOPE
    one grant, 2021 · $200
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
2
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
3
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
4
World Pediatrics

World pediatrics' mission is to heal children and advance pediatric healthcare in the world. world pediatrics' program model is built upon long-term engagement and continuity of multi-specialty care through direct patient care and local…

International
5
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
6
Medical Teams International

Medical teams international is a christian humanitarian relief agency focused on providing life-saving medical care for people in crisis.

International
7
Medical Mission International - Usa

To relieve and alleviate human suffering, misery, poverty, sickness, and distress throughout the world by providing emergency medical relief, funding, and support.

Religion
8
Compassion International Incorporated

Compassion exists to release children from poverty in Jesus' name. Compassion serves all children, regardless of religion, race, ethnicity, or gender.

International
9
Strategic Global Response

Strategic Global Response effectively and efficiently delivers life-saving care to people affected by humanitarian crises, in the most challenging situations on earth

Human Services
10
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
11
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
12
Partnership for Resource Development Inc

Serving the displaced in the middle east.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pinkerton Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONATIONS: $146,125 · OtherDONATIONS+9 more: $14,100 · Other+9 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $18,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA…Mercy Ships International: $16,500 · InternationalMercy Ships InternationalPLAIN COMPASSION CRISIS RESPONSE: $15,000 · InternationalPLAIN COMPASSION CRISIS RESP…AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INCCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $8,800 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE A…FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $7,250 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INC+1 more: $2,650 · InternationalOpen Doors With Brother Andrew Inc: $30,000 · ReligionOpen Doors With…POWERED TO MOVE: $12,000 · ReligionPOWERED TO MOVECHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN …Father Flanagan's Boys' Home: $6,000 · Human ServicesFather Fla…WATER STREET MINISTRIES: $5,150 · Human ServicesWATER STRE…THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 · HealthHONEY BROOK FIRE CO: $1,200 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$160,225International$79,700Religion$42,000Human Services$28,150Health$5,000Public Safety & Disaster$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $18,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $16,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPLAIN COMPASSION CRISIS RESPONSE: $15,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetPOWERED TO MOVE: $12,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $8,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $7,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWATER STREET MINISTRIES: $5,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $2,650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHONEY BROOK FIRE CO: $1,200 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPINKERTON FOUNDATION: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMake-A-Wish Foundation of Greater PA and West Virginia Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Open Doors With Brother Andrew Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds PLAIN COMPASSION CRISIS RESPONSE ↗
  • Who funds POWERED TO MOVE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds WATER STREET MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC ↗
  • Who funds HONEY BROOK FIRE CO ↗
  • Who funds PINKERTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Make-A-Wish Foundation of Greater PA and West Virginia Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization M K King Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from M K King Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 8% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to M K King Foundation?

Find your warmest path to M K King Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on M K King’s filings →

More from the funding graph