Skip to content
Lululilly's Legacy Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Lululilly's Legacy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$500k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $484k
$20,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER OF MINNESOTA$40,000
LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER$34,000
HEALING HEARTS ANIMAL RESCUE$33,000
BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC$33,000
HERDING DOG RESCUE OF CENTRAL OREGON$30,000
NOW FOUNDATION$25,000
WAVES FOR WATER INC$25,000
HIGH FIVES NONPROFIT FOUNDATION$25,000
HOPE FOR UKRAINE$24,000
TIP OF LANE COUNTY$20,000
CASAGAL ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN$20,000
HOPE & SAFETY ALLIANCE$20,000
INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE (IFAW)$20,000
CASCADE CANINE RESCUE EAST & WEST$20,000
THE TREVOR PROJECT$20,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPE & SAFETY ALLIANCE: $20k → 15%WAVES FOR WATER INC: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Better Chance International Rescue
—
2
Asian Dogs Rescue Allies

To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.

Animals
3
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
4
Wolfe Ranch Rescue
Animals
5
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
6
Wildlife Alliance Inc

Wildlife alliance is the leader in direct protection of forests and wildlife in tropical asia. our mission is to combat deforestation, biodiversity loss, climate change, and poverty by partnering with local communities and governments.…

Animals
7
Jet Wag Animal Rescue Inc

Our mission is to move adoptable dogs and cats primarily from heavily-burdened areas to loving homes. We work with trusted partners throughout the country and around the world and facilitate vet care, transport, and adoptions to help…

Animals
8
Animal Rescue of the Rockies

Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.

Animals
9
Idaho Animal Rescue Network

Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…

Animals
10
Hope for China Dogs Rescue

At Hope for China Dogs, we are committed to combating the cruel and inhumane practice of the dog meat trade in China. We believe that every dog deserves to live a life free from pain and suffering, and we are dedicated to rescuing and…

Animals
11
Starfish Animal Rescue
Animals
12
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is Herding Dog Rescue of Central Oregon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
7/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER OF MINNESOTA: $40,000 · OtherIMMIGRATION LAW CENTER OF MINNESOTAHEALING HEARTS ANIMAL RESCUE: $33,000 · OtherHEALING HEARTS ANIMAL RESCUENOW FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherNOW FOUNDATIONTIP OF LANE COUNTY: $20,000 · OtherTIP OF LANE COUNTYCASAGAL ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDREN: $20,000 · OtherCASAGAL ASSOCIATION FOR CHILDRENAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP: $15,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUPCENTER AGAINST RAPE & DOMESTIC VIOLENCE (CARDV): $15,000 · OtherCENTER AGAINST RAPE & DOMESTIC VIOLENCE (CARDV)Achilles International Inc: $10,000 · OtherTOGETHER WOMEN RISE: $10,000 · OtherHIKE FOR MENTAL HEALTH INC: $10,000 · OtherTHE GIVING PLATE: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $16,000 · Other+3 moreBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $33,000 · AnimalsBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INCHERDING DOG RESCUE OF CENTRAL OREGON: $30,000 · AnimalsHERDING DOG RESCUE OF CEN…CASCADE CANINE RESCUE EAST AND WEST: $20,000 · AnimalsCASCADE CANINE RESCUE EAS…INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $20,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR AN…HOMEWARD PET ADOPTION CENTER: $10,000 · AnimalsHOMEWARD PET ADOPTION CEN…WAVES FOR WATER INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesWAVES FOR …WOMENSPACE: $20,000 · Human ServicesWOMENSPACEHIGH FIVES NONPROFIT FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthHIGH FIVE…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $15,000 · HealthST JUDE C…LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC: $34,000 · Science & TechHOPE FOR UKRAINE INC: $24,000 · InternationalTREVOR PROJECT INC: $20,000 · Civil Rights
Other$224,000Animals$113,000Human Services$45,000Health$40,000Science & Tech$34,000International$24,000Civil Rights$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHERDING DOG RESCUE OF CENTRAL OREGON: $30,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetHOPE FOR UKRAINE INC: $24,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWOMENSPACE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER WOMEN RISE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHIKE FOR MENTAL HEALTH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetTHE ACCESS FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lululilly's Legacy’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home