Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lucian and Susan Seifert Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$320k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$423kArts & Culture$196kHuman Services$76kInternational$63kYouth Development$40kReligion$36kEducation$22kCivil Rights$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $218k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$12,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Childrens Hospital LA$60,000
Individual grant recipient$45,000
AFMDA$40,000
Cedars Sinai$38,000
Holocaust Museum LA$35,000
TUNNEL OF TOWERS FOUNDATION$16,000
Operation Home Front$12,000
THE Fisher House$12,000
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS$10,000
Friends of IDF$10,000
Tower Cancer Research Fdt$9,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
HILLEL INTERNATIONAL$7,700
Chabad of Bloomington$6,600
Will Geer Theatricum$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Childrens Hospital LA: $60k → 14%TUNNEL OF TOWERS FOUNDATION: $16k → 11%United Hatzalah: $5k → 17%Operation Home Front: $5k → 14%Operation Home Front: $12k → 16%HILLEL INTERNATIONAL: $8k → 14%Childrens Hospital LA: $60k → 14%TUNNEL OF TOWERS FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%Childrens Hospital: $50k → 14%TUNNEL OF TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%Childrens Hospital LA: $40k → 14%Childerns Hospital: $35k → 14%Childrens Hospital: $30k → 14%Childrens Hospital: $30k → 14%Childerns Hospital: $16k → 14%Will Geer Theatricum: $6k → 14%THE Fisher House: $12k → 14%THE Fisher House: $8k → 14%Fisher House: $5k → 14%THE Fisher House: $5k → 14%USC Keck School of Medicine: $5k → 14%DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $10k → 14%USC Diabetic Center: $5k → 14%DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $5k → 14%USC Diabetic Center: $5k → 14%Keck School of Medicine: $5k → 14%Tower Cancer Research Fdt: $9k → 14%Tower Cancer Research Fdt: $7k → 14%Tower Cancer Research Fdt: $5k → 14%Tower Cancer Research Fdt: $5k → 14%LA Food Bank: $5k → 14%AFMDA: $40k → 14%JEWISH BIG BROTHER: $55k → 14%Jewish Big Brothers: $50k → 14%JEWISH BIG BROTHER: $45k → 14%JEWISH BIG BROTHER: $40k → 14%JEWISH BIG BROTHER: $40k → 14%Jewish Big Brothers: $40k → 14%Cedars Sinai: $38k → 14%Jewish Big Brothers Big Sisters: $30k → 14%JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $10k → 14%Cedars Sinai: $10k → 14%Holocaust Museum LA: $35k → 14%Holocaust Museum LA: $31k → 14%Holocaust Museum LA: $30k → 14%LA MUSEUM OF THE HOLOCAUST: $20k → 14%The Holocaust Museum of LA: $15k → 14%Holocaust Museum LA: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 24 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
16

Total granted

$1.0M
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+39%

Still filing today

33%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    3× · 2023–2025 · $160k · revenue +13%
  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $136k · revenue +62%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $55k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • LM
    LA MUSEUM OF THE HOLOCAUST
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • GARY SINISE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +39%
  • UK
    USC Keck School of Medicine
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
3
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
4
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
5
New York Society for the Relief of the Ruptured and Crippled Maintaining the

The mission of hospital for special surgery is to provide the highest quality patient care, improve mobility, and enhance the quality of life for all and to advance the science of orthopedic surgery, rheumatology, and their related…

Health
6
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
7
The Heart Foundation

The heart foundation (thf) was created to save lives from heart disease by increasing awareness, educating the public, and supporting innovative research at smidt heart institute at cedars-sinai medical center in los angeles, california.…

Philanthropy
8
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
11
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
12
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Road Kings of Burbank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $180,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientChildrens Hospital: $110,000 · OtherChildrens HospitalIndividual grant recipient: $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientChilderns Hospital: $51,000 · OtherChilderns HospitalAFMDA: $40,000 · OtherAFMDATHE Fisher House: $29,500 · Other+27 more: $170,035 · Other+27 moreChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $160,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $55,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CE…TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $26,000 · HealthTOWER CANCER RESEARCH F…+2 more: $685 · HealthHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $136,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MUS…FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $23,100 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $22,500 · InternationalSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $16,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,000 · Education
Other$670,835Health$241,685Arts & Culture$141,000Youth Development$40,000Community Improvement$23,100International$22,500Education$21,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $160,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $136,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES: $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $23,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $9,080 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROAD KINGS OF BURBANK: $2,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $285 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds ROAD KINGS OF BURBANK ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lucian and Susan Seifert Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lucian and Susan Seifert Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lucian and Susan Seifert’s filings →

    More from the funding graph