Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lucas Family Charitable Foundation 043772-000

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$45kEducation$16kReligion$6kHuman Services$3kPhilanthropy$2kRecreation & Sports$500Arts & Culture$500Environment$400Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$750
Median grant
3
States reached
$446k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$6,151
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA$1,000
WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY$750
GILMAN SCHOOL INC$750
WBS FOUNDATION$500
Individual grant recipient$500
SAINT DEMETRIOS CHURCH$300
Individual grant recipient$300
THE SALVATION ARMY$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $900) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%A SENSE OF HOME: $300 → 14%A SENSE OF HOME: $300 → 14%COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CAPE FEAR: $300 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$130k · 15 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +107% since the first grant, against +80% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$130k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+107%
+80%

Still filing today

47%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $43k · revenue +250%
  • GS
    GILMAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4k · revenue +111%
  • Washington and Lee University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • UNC HUSSMAN SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM AND MEDIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +80%
  • WC
    WISH CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • WL
    WESTCHESTER LITTLE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
4
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
5
Lowell School

Lowell school (the school) provides educational services to approximately 314 students in grades pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. the school strives to create a diverse, equitable, and inclusive learning environment, and offers a…

Education
6
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
Fisk University

Fisk university produces graduates from diverse backgrounds with the integrity and intellect required for substantive contributions to society. our curriculum is grounded in the liberal arts. our faculty and administrators emphasize the…

Education
9
Mastery Charter High School

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
10
Bullis School

Bullis school provides a student-centered balanced experience in academics, arts, athletics and community service. bullis uniquely prepares all students to become caring citizens and creative, critical thinkers who will thrive in…

Education
11
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
12
The Oaks School

In an atmosphere of mutual respect and responsibility, the oaks school prepares students to meet the world with the combined wisdom of an intelligent mind, a skilled hand, and a compassionate heart.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ocean Charter School; the most unlike its peers is A Sense of Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $56,552 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $5,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINAIndividual grant recipient: $3,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,951 · Other+7 more: $7,700 · Other+7 moreTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $42,543 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKI…+2 more: $2,600 · Health+2 moreGILMAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $4,400 · EducationWashington and Lee University: $3,250 · EducationOCEAN CHARTER SCHOOL: $1,750 · EducationUNC HUSSMAN SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM AND MEDIA FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationA SENSE OF HOME: $600 · Human ServicesCommunities in Schools of Cape Fear Inc: $300 · Human Services
Other$75,903Health$45,143Education$10,400Human Services$900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $42,543 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGILMAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $4,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWashington and Lee University: $3,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CHARTER SCHOOL: $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEWELL CANCER SUPPORT: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetA SENSE OF HOME: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunities in Schools of Cape Fear Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds GILMAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Washington and Lee University ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL CANCER SUPPORT ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNC HUSSMAN SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM AND MEDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds A SENSE OF HOME ↗
  • Who funds Communities in Schools of Cape Fear Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lucas Family Charitable Foundation 043772-000 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lucas Family Charitable Foundation 043772-000. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lucas Family Charitable Foundation 043772-000’s filings →

    More from the funding graph