Skip to content
Louisiana Rural Health Collective at a glance

· Public charity

Louisiana Rural Health Collective

The lhrc provides resources and services to rhc's in louisiana that aim to enhance their operational efficiency, increase their reimbursement rates, facilitate access to specialized healthcare services, promote high standards of care, improve population health outcomes, and establish a sustainable future for rural healthcare.

$784k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Health$1.7M
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 33 grants below total $277,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $784,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $507,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $187k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
$7,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DESOTO REGIONAL FAMILY MEDICINE - MANSFIELD$15,000
CHILDREN'S INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GROUP - FRANKLINTON$15,000
CHILDREN'S INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GROUP - HAMMOND$15,000
CHILDREN'S INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GROUP - BOGALUSA$15,000
DESOTO REGIONAL FAMILY MEDICINE - LOGANSPORT$15,000
ZWOLLE RURAL CLINIC$15,000
FAMILY HEALTH CARE AND WELLNESS CENTER$7,000
COTTONPORT FAMILY CLINIC$7,000
REDDY FAMILY MEDICAL - NAPOLEONVILLE$7,000
PATTERSON TOTAL CARE CLINIC$7,000
ELIZABETH FAMILY CLINIC$7,000
ACADIANA PRACTITIONERS SUNSET$7,000
FAMILY HEALTHCARE OF BEDICO LLA$7,000
FLEUR-DE-LIS FAMILY HEALTHCARE OF CANKTON$7,000
COMMUNITY FAMILY MEDICAL CLINIC OF BUNKIE LLC$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%PEDIATRIC & ADOLESCENT CLINIC: $10k → 31%REDDY FAMILY MEDICAL CLINIC - PIERRE PART: $10k → 10%CHILDREN'S INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GROUP - FRANKLINTON: $15k → 11%MINDEN MEDICAL CLINIC OF HAUGHTON: $10k → 13%STEWART FAMILY MEDICINE & AFTER HOURS: $10k → 13%BEAUREGARD MEDICAL AND SURGICAL CENTER: $10k → 15%ST JAMES PRIMARY CARE - GRAMERCY: $10k → 16%ZACHARY INTERNAL MEDICINE CLINIC LLC: $10k → 16%ALLEGIANCE MEDICAL CLINIC OF DEQUINCY: $10k → 17%KIDS CLINIC OF CROWLEY: $10k → 17%DRY PRONG FAMILY CLINIC: $10k → 18%LUBBOS MEDICAL PLAZA: $10k → 18%ASSUMPTION COMMUNITY HOSPITAL RURAL HEALTH CLINIC: $10k → 18%TOTAL FAMILY MEDICAL LLC: $10k → 19%LOUISIANA QUICK CARE LLC: $10k → 19%HARDTNER FAMILY CLINIC: $10k → 19%EDWARDS FAMILY MEDICINE: $10k → 19%HEALTH CARE FIRST MEDICAL CLINIC LLC: $10k → 19%WEST OAK FAMILY CLINIC: $10k → 20%DESOTO REGIONAL FAMILY MEDICINE - MANSFIELD: $15k → 20%ST FRANCIS CYPRESS RURAL HEALTH CLINIC: $10k → 20%SOUTHCARE MEDICAL LLC: $10k → 21%RAYVILLE FAMILY CLINIC: $10k → 21%ELIZABETH FAMILY HEALTH CLINIC: $10k → 21%WISNER RURAL HEALTH CLINIC: $10k → 21%MINDEN FAMILY CARE CENTER: $10k → 23%RAYMOND F SCHNEIDER MEMORIAL CLINIC LLC: $10k → 23%BOGALUSA PEDIATRIC CLINIC: $10k → 23%MER ROUGE OUTPATIENT RURAL HEALTH CLINIC: $10k → 23%WEST OUACHITA FAMILY MEDICINE LLC: $10k → 24%WINN WELLNESS CLINIC: $10k → 24%PINE PRAIRIE COMMUNITY CLINIC LLC: $10k → 24%PATTERSON TOTAL CARE CLINIC: $10k → 25%CHRISTUS COUSHATTA RURAL HEALTH CLINIC: $10k → 25%CROWVILLE HEALTH CENTER: $10k → 25%BASILE FAMILY HEALTHCARE: $10k → 25%ST HELENA PARISH HOSPITAL RURAL HEALTH CLINIC: $10k → 25%CHRISTUS COUSHATTA RINGGOLD RURAL HEALTH CLINIC: $10k → 26%MANY EXPRESS CARE: $10k → 26%SIMMESPORT FAMILY CLINIC: $10k → 27%TRINITY MEDICAL VIDALIA CLINIC: $10k → 28%HOMER MEDICAL CLINIC: $10k → 29%ALLEGIANCE MEDICAL CLINIC OF RUSTON: $10k → 32%CHILDREN'S INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GROUP - BOGALUSA: $15k → 11%DESOTO REGIONAL FAMILY MEDICINE - LOGANSPORT: $15k → 20%CHILDREN'S INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GROUP - HAMMOND: $15k → 11%ZWOLLE RURAL CLINIC: $15k → 26%AVOYELLES HOSPITAL RURAL HEALTH CLINIC: $12k → 27%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$588k · 23 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
63

Total granted

$588k
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+12%

Still filing today

4%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    REDDY FAMILY MEDICAL - NAPOLEONVILLE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $85k
  • CF
    COTTONPORT FAMILY CLINIC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $57k
  • CI
    CHILDREN'S INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GROUP - BOGALUSA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $55k

Funded once

  • CL
    CLHG - LEESVILLE LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $60k
  • FP
    FRANKLIN PARISH HSD 1
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • SM
    SAVOY MEDICAL MANAGMENT GROUP INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REDDY FAMILY MEDICAL - NAPOLEONVILLE: $85,000 · OtherREDDY FAMILY MEDICAL - NAPOLEONVILLECLHG - LEESVILLE LLC: $60,000 · OtherCOTTONPORT FAMILY CLINIC: $57,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL GROUP - BOGALUSA: $55,000 · OtherBEAUREGARD HEALTH SYSTEM: $54,000 · Other+78 more: $1,258,000 · Other+78 moreSAVOY MEDICAL MANAGMENT GROUP INC: $50,000 · HealthDesoto Hospital Association Inc DBA Desoto Regional Health System: $45,000 · HealthChristus Health Central Louisiana: $30,000 · HealthUNION GENERAL HOSPITAL: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,569,000Health$125,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAVOY MEDICAL MANAGMENT GROUP INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDesoto Hospital Association Inc DBA Desoto Regional Health System: $45,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChristus Health Central Louisiana: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOur Lady of the Lake Assumption Community Hospital Inc: $17,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNION GENERAL HOSPITAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAVOY MEDICAL MANAGMENT GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds Desoto Hospital Association Inc DBA Desoto Regional Health System ↗
  • Who funds Christus Health Central Louisiana ↗
  • Who funds Our Lady of the Lake Assumption Community Hospital Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Lha Foundation
Lha FoundationLA48.8× affinity21 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lha Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Louisiana Rural Health Collective funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louisiana Rural Health Collective. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Louisiana Rural Health Collective’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home