Skip to content

· Private foundation

Louis Wellan Community Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0150% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$21kArts & Culture$5kRecreation & Sports$650Housing & Shelter$550Human Services$500Food & Nutrition$300Health$200International$150Other$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
2
States reached
$253k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
United Jewish Appeal$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,600
Individual grant recipient$360
Individual grant recipient$350
Individual grant recipient$350
Individual grant recipient$300
Rabbi's Discretionary Fund$250
Christus Cabrini Foundation$250
Kent House$250
Red River Chorale$250
Food Bank of CENLA$200
Individual grant recipient$200
United States Holocaust Memorial Mu$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Changing Lenses Changing Lives: $150 → 11%United States Holocaust Memorial Mu: $200 → 14%Congregation Gemiluth Chassodim: $5k → 19%American Rose Center: $500 → 22%Congregation Gemiluth Chassodim: $5k → 19%Congregation Gemiluth Chassodim: $5k → 19%Jewish Temple: $3k → 19%Congregation Gemiluth Chassodim: $3k → 19%Louisiana Trust for Historic Preser: $200 → 19%Congregation Gemiluth Chassodim: $2k → 19%Congregation Gemiluth Chassodim: $2k → 19%Congregation Gemiluth Chassodim: $2k → 19%Jewish Temple: $2k → 19%B'Nai Israel Synagog: $1k → 19%Louisiana History Museum - Alexandr: $1k → 19%B'Nai Israel Synagog: $350 → 19%B'Nai Israel Synagog: $350 → 19%Rapides Symphony: $350 → 19%Rapides Symphony: $350 → 19%Rapides Symphony: $350 → 19%Jewish Temple: $350 → 19%B'Nai Israel Synagog: $350 → 19%B'Nai Israel Synagog: $350 → 19%B'Nai Israel Synagog: $350 → 19%River Oaks Sq: $300 → 19%City Park Players: $250 → 19%Jewish Temple: $250 → 19%City Park Players: $250 → 19%Christus Cabrini Foundation: $250 → 19%Red River Chorale: $250 → 19%Temple Sisterhood: $250 → 19%Rabbi's Discretionary Fund: $250 → 19%Jewish Temple: $200 → 19%Food Bank of CENLA: $200 → 19%United Jewish Appeal: $10k → 19%United Jewish Appeal: $5k → 19%United Jewish Appeal: $5k → 19%United Jewish Appeal: $5k → 19%United Jewish Appeal: $2k → 19%Kiwanis Boys Camp: $360 → 19%Kiwanis Boys Camp: $300 → 19%Kiwanis Boys Camp: $300 → 19%Kiwanis Boys Camp: $300 → 19%Kent House: $250 → 19%Kent House: $250 → 19%Kiwanis Boys Camp: $200 → 19%Kiwanis Boys Camp: $200 → 19%Kiwanis Boys Camp: $200 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$71k · 16 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$71k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+23%

Still filing today

19%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’25
EducationInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AM
    Alexandria Museum of Art LLC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $4k · revenue +32%
  • US
    USA Shooting Inc
    5× · 2017–2022 · $650 · revenue +22%
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    2× · 2020–2025 · $300 · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • LH
    Louisiana History Museum - Alexandr
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • AR
    American Rose Center
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
4/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

United Jewish Appeal: $26,000 · OtherUnited Jewish AppealIndividual grant recipient: $24,768 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,890 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $3,050 · Other+17 more: $9,400 · Other+17 moreAlexandria Museum of Art LLC: $4,069 · EducationThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $300 · Arts & CultureCHANGING LENSES CHANGING LIVES: $150 · International
Other$69,108Education$4,069Arts & Culture$300International$150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAlexandria Museum of Art LLC: $4,069 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUSA Shooting Inc: $650 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Alexandria Museum of Art LLC ↗
  • Who funds USA Shooting Inc ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds CHANGING LENSES CHANGING LIVES ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Louis Wellan Community Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Louis Wellan Community Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Louis Wellan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph